User's banner
Avatar

minnix

minnix@lemux.minnix.dev
Joined
368 posts • 265 comments

Admin: lemux

Issues and Updates: !server_news

Find me:

mastodon: @minnix@upallnight.minnix.dev

matrix: @minnix:minnix.dev

peertube: @minnix@nightshift.minnix.dev

funkwhale: @minnix@allnightlong.minnix.dev

writefreely: @minnix@tech.minnix.dev

Direct message

I was asking them to post their setup so I can evaluate their experience with regards to Proxmox and disk usage.

permalink
report
parent
reply

There is no way to get acceptable IOPS out of HDDs within Proxmox. Your IO delay will be insane. You could at best stripe a ton of HDDs but even then one enterprise grade SSD will smoke it as far as performance goes. Post screenshots of your current Proxmox HDD/SSD disk setup with your ZFS pool, services, and IO delay and then we can talk. The difference that enterprise gives you is night and day.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yes you don’t need Proxmox for what you’re doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Looking back at your original post, why are you using Proxmox to begin with for NAS storage??

permalink
report
parent
reply

For ZFS what you want is PLP and high DWPD/TBW. This is what Enterprise SSDs provide. Everything you’ve mentioned so far points to you not needing ZFS so there’s nothing to worry about.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yes I’m specifically referring to your ZFS pool containing your VMs/LXCs. Enterprise SSDs for that. Get them on ebay. Just do a search on the Proxmox forums for enterprise vs consumer SSD to see the problem with consumer hardware for ZFS. For Proxmox itself you want something like an NVME with DRAM, specifically underprovisioned for an unused space buffer for the drive controller to use for wear leveling.

permalink
report
parent
reply

ZFS is great, but to take advantage of it’s positives you need the right drives, consumer drives get eaten alive as @scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech mentioned and your IO delay will be unbearable. I use Intel enterprise SSDs and have no issues.

permalink
report
reply