Not only that, they’re all berries.

I guess you can call it byproducts. The bulbs have a strange creamy texture on the inside, but the outside is also quite fibrous. You wouldn’t make a burger from that.

So what about 3D printing? Currently, input shaping uses an accelerometer to calculate resonances and uses that data to adjust movement and reduce flaws in the printing process. For anyone with knowledge of both fields, would this allow a built-in or add-on accelerometer to be used in real time to compensate for momentum and resonances even further?

This is about patents, not about copyrights, for anyone confused. It’s not because some of the characters look like existing pokemon, it’s likely about game mechanics that Nintendo holds patents on.

What? No, they also took melatonin, duh

Does this mean anything to the average user, or is this a very specific use case?

So how is it that a patent from 1989 only expired in 2023?

Not only was it fine, it still looks and plays great. Newer games are still being released that done’t even look as good. The PC version in particular looks fantastic with graphics maxed out.

That was my thoughts. Patents normally expire after 20 years, so how is a patent from the 80s still valid after nearly 40?

Well you’re clearly not 4 years old anyway.