sean

Just because you don’t like when the word theft means capitalism is bad doesn’t mean capitalism is actually good

This sounds like a legal playbook for would-be assassins. Kill at the cost of 15 years with parole max

If what Luigi did was terrorism then I support terrorism! Viva La terror!!!

I’d probably be ready to split your head open if you were #1 so that’s a good thing you aren’t a degenerate religious zealot nobility fuck

You also don’t want to move meat fodder for some politicians war, imagine how North Korean soldiers are being used in Ukraine right now—being tossed at drones so the Russian elite forces flank… you want to be that meat fodder for some weird strange reason and you think you’ll be seen as a hero, no youlll get spit on. You don’t want to be any of them, you think the “elite” forces are better off? Fuck invading someone else’s home. You don’t want to be invaded either, be happy with peace

Don’t settle for being a corporate slave either, you limit your possibilities only to what has happened in the past or in media, not imagining what you actually want

You are born just In time to see a wave of worker co-ops flood the lower classes, you are born just in time to see the community around you needs you right now, not tomorrow

The mere fact that ChatGPT “knows” about certain things indicate that it ingested certain copyrighted works.

This is the bit I’m responding to. This “mere fact” that you propose is not copyright infringement by facts I’ve stated. I’m not making claims to any of your other original statements

Verbatim reproduction may be copyright infringement, but that wasn’t your original claim that I quoted and am responding to (I didn’t make that clear earlier, that’s on me).

“Apologies” for my autistic way of communicating (I’m autistic)

Strangely, ai would have gotten that part right.

I’ve seen many photoshops in my day

Facts aren’t protected by copyright. Regurgitating facts about a thing is in no way illegal, even if done by ai and done by ingested copyrighted material. I can legally make a website dedicated to stating only facts about Disney products (all other things the same) when prompted by questions of my users.

But regular people from countries which are sanctioned by countries do benefit from it, yet their benefit is still not worth it? I understand being critical and wary and vigilant, but to outright deny its usefulness for people with little options outside of official government sanctioned forms of economic power? You’ve deemed their plight and cause as outweighed and tainted by the wealthy who they have zero control over.

bro did it for the content