Avatar

the_three_tomatoes

the_three_tomatoes@lemmy.world
Joined
0 posts • 21 comments
Direct message

For example, reading the articles, it’s impossible to determine if you just read 10 articles about 10 different events, or 10 articles about the same event, because the articles don’t include enough detail. Yet, if people read the same headline then times, they’re going to think it must be true. I’ve gotten into it with people here on Lemmy where they tell me how wrong I am and just look at all these examples of Israel doing a thing, and then they post three examples all talking about the same one event and they don’t even realize.

First off, thanks for the very detailed reply!

This is a very important point. Any numbers can be inflated. When early Zionists committed the Deir Yassin (?) massacre, many Palestinian freedom fighters inflated the real numbers to fear-monger others to join them in their fight. Some also downplayed the numbers for their own reasons. This is one of the things I’ve learned recently just reading about the history of this long conflict. Very interesting!

That being said, I’ve also come to understand that many evidence is video based and can be geolocated and confirmed using landmarks and so on. I doubt that they will only present their case using news articles with no footage/video evidence.

I totally agree that a history of war crimes doesn’t mean Israel is committing all of them 🤣

However one thing that stood out for me was not having allowed adequate aid in. On one hand, Israel says it’s providing enough aid. On the other hand, the UN and every other organization are talking about some of the difficulties of getting aid in and some decisions that Israel has taken sound ridiculous though! I read they didn’t allow dates in, and many everyday items were branded as “dual use” and banned from entering (like scissors!!).

To me the news reports are too chaotic to make a case against Israel, but the throttling of aid entering while also conducting military operations at every single hospital in Gaza could, in my opinion, be strong indicators to use in a case against them at the ICC. Of course I know Hamas operates often from the midst of civilian crowds, but whether they were there in the hospitals or not may not play such a huge role because in the end a large number of civilians were harmed and life-saving and essential infrastructure was destroyed by Israel. It doesn’t look good for them even though I understand why it was necessary.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Good point. It can translate to direct money donations to a political party.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I wonder what kind of “republican” changes to Proton would be possible to put forth without angering the majority of users or defeating the point of Proton altogether. That’s why I don’t see this as a prelude to anything major. What do you think?

permalink
report
parent
reply

And is there a risk he may invest money further into fascism?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Seems to me like the issue is that CEOs exist, not that this particular one has some personal opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fair enough! So what do you hope to accomplish with this action? Like, goal wise, is it to change Proton’s stance? Or is it more about being an ethical consumer?

permalink
report
parent
reply

But wouldn’t it be more productive to talk to Proton about this obviously crappy PR instead of descending into unnecessary cancelling of a perfectly good service?

And how do we know none of the other services also have fascists in their midst? This circle could go on forever until no services are left.

Asking seriously.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I don’t think any CEO I’ve ever worked for speaks for me…

permalink
report
parent
reply