The unsaid implication of your loaded question is that the absence of a Palestinian state is “the fault of the Palestinians”. The further implication is that “Israel has no partner for peace” even now. Basically, the implication being we need to keep doing whatever the Israeli right wants in perpetuity.

If by some miracle you’re not just parroting right wing pro-Israeli talking points, please elaborate what the hell you mean with your question instead.

You think that’s some kind of gotcha. It isn’t.

Reminder that teenagers are children.

Strange how this talk of “collateral” damage only applies to when Israelis kill civilians and not when, say, Hamas or Hezbollah do it.

Using your own despicable and dehumanizing approach, October the 7th merely had 797 “collateral victims” for the 379 legitimate Israeli security forces targets. And after all, the 2:1 civilian to military casualties ratio is basically the same as the IDF’s own record in Gaza.

Ah what to do, such is war…

No.

Fuck that barbaric way of devaluing the loss of human life.

Source: IDF said trust me bro.

Netanyahu desperately needs a regional war. How many people must die so that this bag of shit doesn’t face an Israeli judge for his scandals?

If the third parties abide by Brazilian law, they should have legal representation in the country and therefore can be pursued for circumventing the law?

And your evidence that Israel only targetted active duty Hezbollah combattants?

What a load of ghoulish warmongering. Oh it’s war? If Hezbollah had done this to Israelis, the world would be crying blood and vowing for Israel’s right to defend itself.

Jew media

Fuck off.