DS224+ will likely give you really good performance based on what you mentioned. Although the max RAM (6GB) could potentially be a concern if you run too many containers

Have you had your drive(s) for a while? Could be WDDA throwing up the warning. See this video if you haven’t already https://youtu.be/jx4i64uqsIA?si=BbV1GGCL6GRJ3VM8

or this article too https://nascompares.com/answer/understanding-wdda-warning-on-wd-drives-should-you-replace-your-nas-drives/#What_is_WDDA

What kind of drive is it? There’s a chance the alert could be legitimate.

This is incredibly useful! Looking forward to the release!

thanks for this! it worked. and come to think of it, i remember having to do something similar to refresh the ip on a raspberry pi a while back

this didn’t work for me unfortunately, it had ended up going back to the same ip it had

“Known to collect” is going to be vastly different from what’s actually being collected. It’s more realistically just serving ads, getting some crash/error reporting. But because it’s all under Google, it’s going to show up as Google. DDG/other blockers won’t know the difference.

I believe this is from enabling colorful mode inside Theme Management in Settings

Edit: on second thought, that wasn’t it

Oh, happy days!

My hope is that if I initialize NAS with just the SSD first, it’d have the smallest drive number, so DSM would just start off that. And maybe get some more performance if other apps/containers also ran off the SSD.