You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
19 points

I hate that I need an app to change the colour of my fucking lightbulb, give me a remote instead, damn.

That being said, I prefer using apps over the browser because they load way faster.

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

I have Phillips wiz bulbs in my house and I can do most of the stuff in the app from Google home. The only thing I can do is set scenes but I rarely use those.

The only real downside is these use some Phillips API so of course to work they call back to their servers so that stop being smart without an Internet connection. Some day I’ll move my light bulbs out of the cloud but that day is not today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I have one from a brand called Enki and not only they made me dowload an app but I had to make an account as well. And every time I want to use that damn app it has logged me out and I need to type my credentials once again.

I didn’t know about Google Home, I’ll check if I can use that one instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

There’s a lot of reasons to use a app over a browser.

Speed is not one of them.

As a web dev, we can absolutely provide you faster experience. Depending on the service and needs, we can blow any app awaym

But a app can access hardware tools that browsers cannot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I don’t know the technical reason but, on my phone, the browser takes a few seconds to load every page, while on an app it’s way faster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Of course a good website can beat a shit app. But there’s no way that you can build a website that’s faster than a good app.

First of all, because your website has to run on an actual app, called a web browser. Additionally, you can’t magically remove the initial load time to fetch resources from the server. Those resources are already on your phone on the app so it’s instantaneous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

You…realize that when you visit a website more than once the resources are also available on your phone right? Even the most bloated JS monstrosity will have most of its data cached after the first visit and the initial load time will be as good as an installed app after the first visit. You’re not fetching all 200mb of its JavaScript every time you visit the site. Of course, if the site updates its code, you’ll have to re-fetch it, but the same goes for app updates.

Obviously if your app is designed to work offline, a website probably is going to be worse. But that’s a scenario that actually does warrant a standalone app, which does not go for the majority of apps.

Most apps just do CRUD and act as a thin client to fetch data from a server (this includes pretty much all social media apps). There is not going to be a real difference in speed between loading the site in a web browser with cached resources or a fully-fledged app you install, except the app can harvest data from you in ways that can be prevented by a good browser. Actually, a site can be faster in many cases since it leverages libraries and capabilities already built into and loaded by a browser while an app might have to load its own standalone resources. And being able to access the app offline in these instances is worthless because if your connection isn’t good enough to serve the website, it’s not good enough to use the app either.

permalink
report
parent
reply