The NFL season is about to start and it would be nice to have as many people as possible participating on the communities from https://nfl.community. Being a topic-specific instance with closed registrations, I’m aware that it is harder to be discovered, so I’m writing here with the intent of both promoting a bit and to find enthusiasts joining in.

If you’d like to help the instance and the team communities grow, there are two ways to help:

  • Join https://fediverser.network, find the Lemmy community you want to help and apply to become a Community Ambassador. Community Ambassadors can add different sources of content and also send invites to “good” reddit users to migrate.

  • Become a moderator of your team community. The communities are still all low in traffic, so I guess the hardest part for the moderators will be in finding and posting the type of content that you’d like to see in the community, in order to set out its tone.

As always, if you have any questions don’t hesitate to ask!

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points

<…> the main goal of Fediverser is not to create a comprehensive map <…>

I’m confused.

<…> are not familiar with how the Fediverse works to get started. For them, it’s better to have one entry point for most of their topics, then to give them a bunch of different communities with the same name but slightly different mechanics.

Seems counterproductive. I thought we want people to embrace the Fediverse because it’s Fediverse and not to create a clone of enshitified platforms. Funneling people to a few instances just amplifies the issue of big instances being the only place to grow any new community.

Ideally, something proportional to the corresponding subreddit and with more than one single person dominating the posting.

So it’s better to promote the same popular communities and create a doom-loop of no new community ever-growing in activity because it never gets recommended?

We seem to have a different philosophy of what Fediverse is. Embracing diversity and federation are the fundamental principles behind Fediverse to me, not just trying to increase statistical numbers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You are right. The wording needs to change, it should read as something like “comprehensive map of alternatives to Reddit”, which is only in the subheader.

I thought we want people to embrace the Fediverse because it’s Fediverse and not to create a clone of enshitified platforms.

Baby steps. go take a look at /r/RedditAlternatives right now and see how many people are telling how difficult it is to migrate. We are not getting them out of enshittified platforms if they are thrown into a whole new paradigm. We need to ease them into it.

So it’s better to promote the same popular communities and create a doom-loop of no new community ever-growing in activity because it never gets recommended?

Yes. The paradox of choice is real. You and I might prefer to have absolute control, but the large majority of people are simply looking for a straightforward solution to their immediate needs. Just last week I was arguing with someone on !newcommunities@lemmy.world because it was the 5th community in a month created to talk about TV shows and movies.

If the recommended alternative is bad somehow, then sure let’s move on. But if it is good enough, then please just let it be flexible and accept it.

Embracing diversity and federation are the fundamental principles behind Fediverse to me.

The code is open source, and you are welcome to run your own instance of Fediverser, and the recommendation database can be cloned or forked however you see fit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

<…> comprehensive map of alternatives to Reddit <…>

How is it comprehensive if it only lists singular alternatives? Seems contradictory.

Baby steps. go take a look at /r/RedditAlternatives right now and see how many people are telling how difficult it is to migrate. We are not getting them out of enshittified platforms if they are thrown into a whole new paradigm. We need to ease them into it.

Proposed service doesn’t solve the issue, just delays it. Explained in https://lemmy.zip/comment/12893935

<…> the large majority of people are simply looking for a straightforward solution to their immediate needs.

Then they are not interested in the Fediverse, but like I mentioned they are looking for a clone of whatever enshitified platform they left. You will never keep these type of users, as they will just go back to where they came from and complain how shitty that different place is. The goal should be to attract lurkers and convert them into posters.

The code is open source, and you are welcome to run your own instance of Fediverser, and the recommendation database can be cloned or forked however you see fit.

To elevate Reddit user confusion about migration, we should have multiple Fediverser sites? If your primary goal is really to migrate Reddit users, then that is a horrible way to go about it. That would mean multiple Ambassadors, different recommendations and lack of any consistency between added communities, subreddits, recommendations and probably even instances.


The criteria also seem to not be applied universally. https://fediverser.network/subreddits/playstation lists a community with 0 interactions over several bigger and more active ones, same with https://fediverser.network/subreddits/xbox.

!rivian@lemmy.zip was rejected as a first alternative to subreddit after I expressed my hesitation in a private message to migrate the community to gearhead.town at this point in time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

only lists singular alternatives?

It’s comprehensive for the point of view of subreddits, not of the Lemmy communities. The idea is to have one recommendation for each subreddit, not of all communities that can theoretically be related to a given subreddit.

The goal should be to attract lurkers and convert them into posters.

That was also my argument when Reddit content was automatically mirrored on alien.top. That’s also one of the reasons that I’m giving preference to topic-based instances. If someone sets up a Fediverser instance to mirror Reddit content and sends them to a topic-based instance, there will be less complaints than if the they are pointing out to a community on an instance that happens to host one relevant community.

we should have multiple Fediverser sites?

Multiple fediverser sites is not a problem. Actually, there are already other deployments and I’m actively looking for other admins willing to deploy it on their servers.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fedigrow

!fedigrow@lemm.ee

Create post

To discuss how to grow and manage communities / magazines on Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed and Sublinks

Community stats

  • 282

    Monthly active users

  • 56

    Posts

  • 1.6K

    Comments