You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
-27 points

$5 a month and you can share with 5 other users. That’s 90c per person. Why would anyone not have YouTube premium?

permalink
report
reply
28 points

Where are you at where it’s $5 a month for the family plan? In the US it’s $15 for the single user, or $23 for the family plan.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I pay ₴150 (Ukrainian hryvnia) for a family plan of 6, which is currently roughly $3.60 (after the currency tanked due to war). *hide the pain dab*

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s interesting, here in Poland you pay ~$12 for the family plan.

I didn’t know it was that expensive in US. That sucks, man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

South Africa

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

first and foremost you’re paying for a worse experience than just installing an adblocker.

Paying for convenience isn’t the same as paying to not be inconvenienced.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I pay for Premium for a few different reasons:

  1. I don’t need to even think about fighting with ad block blockers.
  2. I also get YouTube Music, so I no longer need to pay for Spotify.
  3. Premium views pay creators more than regular views.
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

There is clearly a value proposition or no one would pay for it. I personally don’t like to reward any company using the pay to not be inconvenienced model

A lot of people would rather fight adblockers (idk, literally never been an issue for me), use xManager (oh right spotify is free) , Pay creators you like through patreon (or buy their shitty amazon links or merch or whatever)

Premium is just rewarding youtube for making their platform worse in order to sell premium and fuck that noise.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

For me it’s a way to help support content creators, along with donations/merch, although admittedly not having to even try to block the ads is a nice bonus.

I wouldn’t necessarily call myself a YouTube fan, and it will be something I continue to evaluate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Youtube premium gives you a higher bitrate option as well.

I think it’s only for lower resolutions (other than 4k) but if the video was uploaded with an absurdly high bitrate you can see a slightly less destroyed version.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It is not about money. Google created a problem and then asked money to solve it. If I were a billionaire I still wouldn’t paid a single penny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

They created the problem of creators needing to be paid without using ads?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Skippable and short ads were fine. No one asked for annoying ads and a “premium” service. And it was already profitable. Greedy Google wanted more money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Because I can get the same results + more for free

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

By not paying the content creators for the content you consume.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, that’s how YouTube works: you don’t pay for individual videos

If someone wants to go that route for their content then there are sites for that

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Because I’m not giving Alphabet any information about me. It’s also why I don’t create a YouTube account and use browsers with common fingerprints.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Trying to avoid fingerprinting often results in easier fingerprinting.

Your browser might have a common fingerprint, but other points of configuration (screen size, window size, webrtc, etc) belie those.

Usually it just gets you put in the “People who don’t like ads” advertising bin. They have specific ways to try to target us.

Relevant Bill Hicks: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NXi-9kA4ERM&t=75s

I know what all the marketing people are thinking right now, too.

“Oh you know what Bill’s doing? He’s going for that ‘anti-marketing dollar.’ That’s a good market, he’s very smart.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

ther points of configuration (screen size, window size, webrtc, etc) belie those.

Those are also part of the fingerprinting that I’m talking about, and browsers like Tor and Mullvad take some or all of them into account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

It’s £20 ($26.33) per month here. You are either lying or are in an exceptionally cheap country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I can think only for one legitimate reason:

  • Google bought out YouTube and operated it at loss for most of its life, effectively making it a monopoly in the process, and only started to earn money on it when there was no way any other alternative would come up and endanger it.

If you ignore this, YouTube Premium is a pretty good offer. And I personally like the fact that I support content creators, without the need of watching ads that are nothing more than cancer for society.

That said, I would still prefer YouTube to return to its roots and separate from Google, since it’s pretty much possible for it to stand on its own right now, I guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Because it’s £15 in the uk ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

They speak of sharing with others, so they’re talking about the family plan, so it’s actually £20 in the UK.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In Germany, the family plan costs €23.99, but the worst part is that even when you pay for it, there are still ads from the creators within the videos. Essentially, you’re paying for nothing, not to mention that they are much more expensive than all other video platforms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Because it’s $15 in the us? lol

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 259K

    Comments