If I can’t navigate to your house without GPS does that mean when I arrive NATO is fucking your mother?
They also can’t attack assets inside Russia without using Russian airspace. Russian airspace is equally complicit.
What about Russian sunlight, moonlight or clouds? Are those complicit as well? This is an important question, pls respond!
Sunlight definitely played a key role. Can’t see your target without sunlight.
Can somebody explain why this was removed? It didn’t break any rules, “Russian cope” isn’t prohibited by the rules. Just trying to understand the logic. How does deleting controversial opinions (that aren’t hate speech or call for violence) help anyone?
Side note, I just realized that Rule 5. says “no politics”. How is this even possible? 80% of content here is politics in some shape or form, just like this post.
Rule 2 Russian propaganda is factually incorrect. All factually incorrect information that isn’t obviously satire should have matching citations explaining why it’s incorrect.
Rule 4 Russian propaganda is hatespeech.
Rule 5 No politics.
I don’t pretend to be unbiased or neutral. If what you want is a rule that says don’t suck Russian cock by propagating the talking points of war criminals, I’ll be glad to add it.
How does deleting controversial opinions (that aren’t hate speech or call for violence) help anyone?
If you came to a defense shitposting community looking for help you may have come to the wrong place.
Russia is bad and tells only lies, but this is a pretty egregious twisting of Rule 4
Just to be clear I do see the Russians as the bad guys and think their invasion is evil and illegal.