You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-177 points

No. This is why if you like a service, you pay for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Like Cable Television, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

And that’s how things die due to no revenue. Running YouTube is expensive af and the more people who used things like revanced, the worse things will become for everyone else.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Maybe they shouldn’t operate in the first place if they cannot think of a sustainable business model without f*ing their users up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s funny how you put all the blame on the users and none on the people that run the site. They fail to pay creators properly, fail to protect them from copyright claim abuse, and all the while they expect those creators to keep making content to keep their site relevant. It’s going to come crashing down eventually.

Also, in matters of taste the customer is always right. If people are so fed up with ads that they adblock en masse and/or leave, then youtube are the only ones to blame.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I’m a premium user so I’m not affected (for now)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

But I hate the service, it’s the only service around though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

There’s a reason why they are the only ones. It’s very hard to scale a platform to YouTube scale. Like insanely hard and very expensive. The only other players that could take over are Meta and maybe Microsoft. Not sure if they would be any better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

There’s others that are at that scale. Amazon, Valve, battle.net, Netflix, pornhub, CloudFlare, to name a few.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ve been thinking that pornhub might make a good competition if they made a safe for work version.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

lol you hate the service so it makes it ok for you to steal? K good sirs, keep on pirating

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Is pirating stealing? Nothing was taken from YouTube. You could say it’s unauthorized access, or unauthorized duplication of data, but none of that leaves YouTube down any data.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Because somehow paying $4 a month is unreasonable for a service that I use for 2-4 hours every day.

Right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
-3 points

I use SponsorBlock.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And you realize that YouTube will do everything in their hands to stop you from using these apps in the future right? That was kinda the point of the article.

Making people pay (with their time and attention) while they are already paying for subscription will not encourage more people to buy premium.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Personally I don’t want to pay Google out of principle tbh, the creators I support can benefit from my Patreon donations and Nebula subscription

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

I find this take wierd. If you do not want to support Google, stop using services created by them.

The content creators can upload videos to multiple platforms if they want to

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

That’s way too expensive and I can’t afford it. YTP is less than $4 a month so at least the creators gets at least a few cents from my views, and I watch a lot of creators.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Where the hell are you paying less than $4 a month? It’s $14 here in America. Even with a student discount, it’s still twice the price you’re quoting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
61 points

Does YouTube pay their content creators properly? No, they have to rely on external partnerships. Does YouTube help their creators solve issues with greedy companies making copyright claims on not their content? No, they close channels because of such claims and strip creators of income they deserve. Does YouTube keep their platform secure to protect its creators? No, hackers managed to get access to the biggest channels on the platform despite YouTube being aware of the issues for months. Does YouTube at least use their knowledge from spying its users to stop bots posting comments? No, bot comments are all over the place. And I could go like that for ages…

The fact is YouTube is a shitty platform and people use it because they have to not because they want to. Because they have a fucking monopoly! People are paying thousands of dollars directly to content creators through platforms like Patreon, because they like the content. But people are not willing to support financially the platform that openly don’t give a fuck about their users and creators (which are the only reason this platform exists) and care only about their shareholders. Because why would they pay to make the rich richer while content creators struggle to earn money for rent!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Good thing I don’t like youtube.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

I meant that if you use YouTube a lot, it would be fair to pay for an ad-free experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Google has been shamelessly destroying all their projects the last few years in a desperate fit to make money. They’ve weakened ad blockers on chrome, they’ve altered the search algorithm so random BS is mixed in with regular to drive towards sponsored content, their starting to setup browser level DRM and creating un skipable ads. None of this is for anything more than greed and desperation. They no longer see anything other than money as the end goal and don’t care if their selling a shittier product at a higher price than no one was ever even willing to pay for. F*ck google.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-19 points

YT Premium costs less than $4 for me and I also get YT Music. It sure beats paying $4 for only a music service.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Until its no longer profitable like the hundreds of other BS google tricks you into supporting only to ditch later https://killedbygoogle.com/ . Also in what world are you paying under $4 the standard package today is $13.99

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Oh nooo, who will think of the big tech who continue to get record profits every year?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-12 points

I want creators to get paid when I watch them but I also don’t want ads. YT Premium is affordable (it costs less than $4 a month for me) for me and I also get YT Music with it. I watch hundreds of hours worth of video from multiple creators so it’s a fair deal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Woah dude that’s crazy. Anyways, I’m still going to AdBlock them and pirate yt music. Big tech can suck my

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Quit bragging and start sharing that code you’re using for $4/month YT Premium that the rest of us have to pay $13.99 after last month’s price hike.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points
*

No. This is why if a service loses sight of its core value proposition, it dies.

If youtube is actually successful in killing adblocking on their service - which I suppose a server-side timer could actually do - then they will only succeed in killing their relevance, just like so many social media seem to be doing right now.

I pay for services like a debrid and VPN, because they provide me with the services I need. For very few dollars a month I can get 4K streaming from their servers 24/7. That is all hosting should cost. If the fediverse version of youtube, peertube, became mainstream then collectively people should have absolutely no problem maintaining those costs from the users’ side.

Once that happens and mainstream video streaming is part of the fediverse, I think the network effect that governs social media might snowball until eventualy centralised social media is a thing of the past.

Do not pay for youtube, whatever you do. Let them die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

lol this post is nothing more than a tantrum from a leech of a service they’re too cheap to pay for and scrabbling for reasons other than said cheap-ness

you may get likes on the internet for this wholly selfish take but we all know it’s nothing more than that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s just devastating when you invent unwholesome motivations for my words to attack as an alternative to attacking the ideas themselves.

My ego is in tatters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

You do realize the average person watches YouTube on their TV or their phone, with ads? You are not the target audience for Google.

So I fully expect YouTube to kill adblocking at some point and they might lose what? 10% of users? Of which 5% either come back to watch ads or pay the subscription because all the content is on there?

I’m 100% pro adblocker, the internet is a mess without, but it’s stupid to think YouTube wouldn’t cut you off the moment you don’t provide any benefit to their service (For example despite adblocking you might give Superchat money to streamers, or join Streamer memberships).

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Audience is only part of the equation, arguably not the largest part. How many content creators use adblock? The big ones already know how completely meaningless ad revenue is because youtube doesn’t pay them enough and they are already aware of how easy it is to block ads. Also they’re more likely to be using youtube on a desktop because they use one to create, and they also are more aware of the alternatives like revanced. A lot of big creators have spoken out over the years in favour of adblocking.

If youtube makes it impossible for creators to use their own platform they’ll leave in droves, and they will have the voice to encourage their audience to follow. Youtube isn’t the main voice on their own site, the creators are.

Another thing this will impact is the ability for creators to collaborate, since they would have to watch others’ ads in order to see their videos.

Once that happens, the audience will naturally follow. That’s how social media sites have failed in the past. They’ve pissed off the power users to the point they finally left, then the content declined, then users followed.

Youtube is making the same mistake all capitalist entities do, of mistreating the people who actually make the product they’re selling. It’s a fundamental contradiction that only leads to decline in the end, it’s just a matter of when. This may not be the straw that breaks the camel’s back, if this isn’t it, then something down the line will be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

“Soon we will have a new web. One far younger and far more powerful.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

You think too much of the average person. This sort of thing might affect you, but it won’t affect your friend’s 8 year old brother or his parents who just want a convenient way to watch pewdiepie

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Social networks don’t succeed or fail on casual viewers alone. Youtube is a video sharing site, not a content producer. If they get so toxic that the content producers start finding alternatives, then the casual viewers won’t all leave right away.

If it gets so bad that big creators, like pewdiepie, have alternatives that grow in relevance and youtube loses its critical market share then it will eventually lose the casual viewers too, especially if those alternatives aren’t up to their eyeballs in ads.

We saw this with digg losing its place to reddit, where they sold out their content to publishers. Content got thinner and worse until the vast majority of users left for reddit.

This may not be the straw that breaks the camel’s back. For reddit it was the API lockdown, for twitter it’s… well I could point to any number of individual decisions but let’s just call them Elon Musk. Facebook hasn’t quite hit that tipping point yet I don’t think.

With youtube I can easily see this being part of a string of decisions to promote publisher content over user content. They’re already selling views which could really sink them in the end.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Perhaps, but you can only crush so much blood from a stone and the masses are slowly becoming destitute.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’ll gladly pay for a service that doesn’t thrive on pushing propaganda down people’s throats to maximize watch time and that isn’t actively trying to make my user experience miserable by removing downvotes, forcing shorts and so on.

I’d rather pay someone to kick me in the nuts. Sounds like a better deal tbh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I support the sentiment, but today everything is a service that wants your money, this resource is finite. And when it comes to YouTube, it’s not even about whether you like it or not: YouTube is a monopolist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

if google made youtube premium like $3/month no one would bat an eye and sub. but they’re approaching netflix prices and that’s just way to much. i rather support the creators directly than throwing money at google who will give the creators crumbs until they demonetize them because google is doing google things. also won’t solve the privacy problem that comes with using their native site/apps.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I think part of the problem is that they’re hosting so much more content than Netflix. It really is crazy that it’s free to upload to YouTube to just store all your videos on there. Probably 99.9% of YouTube content does not get enough views to justify the cost of storing it.

All that being said, YouTube premium comes with a bunch of shit nobody wants so surely they could cut that stuff to lower the price (or tiered pricing for people who want it).

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

In some places they are more expensive than Netflix…

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments