Disclaimer: this is purposefully obtuse.

Other effects in the game which explicitly state they kill you:

Shadows, succubi, massive damage, death saving throws, beholder death ray (notably not even their disintegration ray kills you), power word kill, vampires, mind flayers, night hags, drow inquisitors.

Clearly, if they intended for disintegration to kill you, they’d have said so. Since specific overrides general, and there is no general rule that disintegrated creatures are dead, I rest my case. QED.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
16 points

You’re misreading the language. It is present-tense, not future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I’m sorry, I don’t know enough about the English language to recognise the difference. What would the phrase be in future tense?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If the creature dies it can be restored to life only by means of…

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

No. He’s trolling you. No Reasonable person thinks this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

I’m not misreading anything. “The creature can only…” applies a new state to the creature. After that state has been applied, or somehow reversed (unaware of any way to do this by RAW), then the creature can only be brought back to life by the means mentioned in the spell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yes you are. You’re intentionally abusing a weakness in English language (present and future tense are often written the same way so must be inferred by context) to assume something clearly not intended by the 2 sentences considered holistically.

It’s a funny joke. +1, but, ain’t no DM takin dis Hail Mary from a player seriously. 😂

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points
*

Just playing the game RAW.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Wanna bet?

I’d make it an absolute realistic pile of dust, unable to move, unable to cast magic, fight, or anything but be carried along by whatever picked it up, and when enough of the dust gets separated, death is automatic.

But I’d still allow it as an interesting edge case once.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I bet Brennan lee mulligan would lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

ain’t no DM takin dis Hail Mary from a player seriously

I absolutely would, my players would need to be creative to allow this dust pile to communicate and do anything, but I’m quite sure they could manage

permalink
report
parent
reply

RPGMemes

!rpgmemes@ttrpg.network

Create post

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

Community stats

  • 2.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 21K

    Comments