You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
146 points

Here is a Google image of Dodge ram 3500. EVEN IF YOU NEED A CAR, NO ONE NEEDS A VEHICLE THIS BIG.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

But how else can you ensure a 100% fatality rate of everything you run over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

And also make sure that you don’t have to see the poor people as you run them over.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

The issue is not so much size but height. These things are all over where I am as fleet vehicles and even the good ol’ type will comment that they can not see anything in front. Just look at the door or normal car in the background of that picture and you get an idea. These hoods are no joke 1.7 meters high for no other reason then to look mean.

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

Obligatory…

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

This is a lot of space to tell me what I already know, that driving my Abrams tank is very safe for me and pretty safe for others

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Got me thinking, why don’t they put forward facing cameras? Like how we have backup cams.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

It’s wild how there’s this kind of evolutionary pressure to turn the grills into ever bigger and more menacing threat displays and it just keeps spiralling out of control because the cars in the rear view mirror only keep getting bigger and more intimidating and you constantly need to buy a new ego prosthetic in the form of a suburban tank like this to keep up with the other drivers that signal “I’M GONNA EAT YOU ALIVE” to you during every commute and grocery run. I’m sure manufacturers love that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I need a pickup truck for farm work, but I hate how big these things have gotten. I wouldn’t buy anything made in the past 20 years. All this height for no practical benefit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Legit, like i understand having a use for that big open storage solution but seeing how they are now too tall to reach is odd as heck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Old trucks are actual working trucks. The bed is low enough to easily lift heavy objects into. Modern trucks have no practical purpose in mind. They’re purely aesthetic. Nearly any load you’re lifting into that thing can also be hauled in almost any other vehicle easier. You’d need a forklift to load anything substantial, in which case an old truck or a van would be easier.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

GMC named their bro-dozers AT-4. AT as in anti-tank. They’re marketing to the suburban tacticool jackasses. Loud exhaust and parking in crowded bus shelters. Yeah fuck these guys.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

But what if you want to run over all your children in one go?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

We already have horses for that, and you don’t even need to drive them yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Self-driving horses are the future.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I got a family!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

A used ranger accommodated all of my hauling needs with room to spare when I needed it for work. I drove the company pickup which had the double rear tires once and it was awful and I couldn’t recommend it even just for doing pickup truck things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Look, I’m terribly insecure and fragile. You expect me to drive something reasonable?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

how else are they supposed to haul around their ego?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s so fucking annoying when I’m trying to turn and check for oncoming traffic and one of these or its smaller cousins pulls up next to me so I can’t see

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

How else am I supposed to haul all of my groceries for a week? \s

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But I need to pick up 50 lbs of mulch from Home Depot once a year 😭😭😭

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It just screams micro peen

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

I prefer to say, “masculinity crisis.”

Everybody knows what you mean, but you don’t offend anybody with a small wiener.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

None taken.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

they’re compensating.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

We’re lucky as fuck to have you here to assess the needs of the entire population. Here’s an example. I do concerts for a living. We haul mobile stages. They are quite a few tons. What vehicle to you recommend we tow them with? And should we bring a second vehicle to drive around while the stage is in place for the weekend instead of using the truck that’s already there?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Do you think you’re the only roadie in the world? These vehicles don’t exist abroad. Just check what the fuck they’re doing in Europe. Also you can get a van that doesn’t block your pov (see image) but that wouldn’t look cool would it? Please get your head out of your ass before you comment next time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points

You lose just about anyone willing to listen to you (outside this echo chamber) when you go off the rails about how they have no use and none needs them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Eh, you need them for work and someone who lives out in the countryside probably could make regular use of them.

The blame rests on the automakers though, pickup trucks used to have the same cargo capacity but were smaller. This lack of visibility is 100% an aesthetic choice. Look at the sprinter truck as an example, it can pull and has great visibility.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

BS you genuinely do not need it. Go look at what long time contractors are driving, it’s mostly smaller toyota trucks or vans.

You need a huge truck to haul some huge shit for the day? Rent it, duh

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I’m not renting a truck to tow my car or motorcycle 50 runs a year 🤷‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Why would you need that specific truck? It looks like it is gigantic for the sake of being gigantic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Larger boats, RVs, helpful if not strictly required for plowing. A 3500 is definitely on the side of specialized though. These are far rarer than a half ton (1500 in dodge branding).

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points

So it would’ve been fine and dandy if the cyclist had been killed by someone driving a Prius?

'Cause that’s what you imply by placing this bullshit emphasis trying to single out big trucks in particular. Comments like yours reek of implied small-car apologism, and I, for one, am getting sick and hired of it!

There’s a reason this community is called “fuck cars,” and not “fuck big trucks” or something. it’s because the problem is cars — all of them!

Any car, even the smallest, can turn a pedestrian or cyclist into a red smear when driven negligently.

Every car, even the smallest, takes up an entire lane on the street and an entire parking space.

Every car, even the smallest, contributes to car-dependent urban design.

Singling out big trucks as if they’re materially worse than all the other death machines is nothing but a distraction from the real problem at best, and an active disinformation campaign at worst. Our goals should be to get people out of cars entirely, not just into smaller ones!

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

No, it probably wouldn’t have happened in the first place, because the driver of a sensibly-sized car can see things that are less than fifty fucking feet ahead of the dash.

Monstrous behemoths like this should be prohibitively expensive to own for personal use and/or be restricted to industrial/ag use only. Fuck your camping or hauling one chair or whatever the fuck you do twice a year. You can rent for something that seldom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

They are last time I checked “prohibitively expensive” but people are dumb enough to pay $100k over 8 year financing. These things are also no better for “industrial/ag” then a truck from 30 years ago that was 4 feet less tall, had an 8 foot bed and a similar towing capacity at a fraction of the price.

These things are the crystallization of our hubris.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

No, it probably wouldn’t have happened in the first place, because the driver of a sensibly-sized car can see things that are less than fifty fucking feet ahead of the dash.

[X] doubt

If big trucks were banned, muderous MAGA psychopaths would just mow down cyclists using Dodge Chargers or whatever instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

The thing is, they are materially worse than other consumer vehicles. They do all the bad things but more, and their normalization makes it all worse for everyone – have you seen the size of parking spaces in Europe?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

they are materially worse than other consumer vehicles

Not in the way that actually matters, which is their effect on low-density zoning and minimum parking requirements. A parking space is a parking space is a parking space — they’re all (roughly) the same size!

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

There is evidence that these shit wagons are largely responsible for a major increase in pedestrian fatalities.

EVs are also a cause, because of their heavy batteries. It’s like getting hit by a tank.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

You know what causes pedestrian fatalities? The presence of cars of any size.

You know what eliminates pedestrian fatalities? Deleting parking lots and pedestrianizing streets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

No, not all cars are created equally. Some require much more public space and some are also much more efficient at killing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

My truck is a good boy, he wouldn’t harm a fly. It’s all about upbringing, genetics has nothing to do with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Some require much more public space

Bullshit. A subcompact takes up exactly the same “one parking space” as a truck, and is therefore just as bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Fuck cars but trucks and SUVs are more dangerous than cars to pedestrians, and to argue otherwise just makes you look silly

https://youtu.be/jN7mSXMruEo?t=521

active disinformation campaign at worst

Relax

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This community is so fucking funny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes, it is funny that folks here apparently just want to circlejerk scapegoating big trucks while downvoting any actual urbanist who dares to point out that they’re focusing on the wrong problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I find as cars get either bigger or more expensive or both, the driver’s get proportionally more reckless, ignorant, and entitled. It’s always the big trucks, bmw’s, and teslas that seem intent on running me off the road or flat when I’m biking to work. I don’t know about the more recent ones but the early Prius I rented on a vacation before had shit visibility so I wouldn’t give that one a free pass at least. All this shit seems so futile though. I just want the jumbo sidewalks with a bike lane to be everywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

All this shit seems so futile though. I just want the jumbo sidewalks with a bike lane to be everywhere.

Sidewalks and bike lanes don’t get used unless (a) destinations are packed closely enough together for enough trips to be in reasonable walking or cycling distance, and (b) the experience is reasonably pleasant (i.e., not a no-man’s-land sandwiched between a stroad and a bunch of parking lots).

In other words, it’s the zoning that has to be fixed first, by increasing density and removing minimum parking requirements.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fuck Cars

!fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

Create post

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

  • to raise awareness around the dangers, inefficiencies and injustice that can come from car dependence.
  • to allow a place to discuss and promote more healthy transport methods and ways of living.

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn’t choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don’t use slurs. You can laugh at someone’s fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don’t post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn’t a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

Community stats

  • 3.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 666

    Posts

  • 13K

    Comments