You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-34 points

So it would’ve been fine and dandy if the cyclist had been killed by someone driving a Prius?

'Cause that’s what you imply by placing this bullshit emphasis trying to single out big trucks in particular. Comments like yours reek of implied small-car apologism, and I, for one, am getting sick and hired of it!

There’s a reason this community is called “fuck cars,” and not “fuck big trucks” or something. it’s because the problem is cars — all of them!

Any car, even the smallest, can turn a pedestrian or cyclist into a red smear when driven negligently.

Every car, even the smallest, takes up an entire lane on the street and an entire parking space.

Every car, even the smallest, contributes to car-dependent urban design.

Singling out big trucks as if they’re materially worse than all the other death machines is nothing but a distraction from the real problem at best, and an active disinformation campaign at worst. Our goals should be to get people out of cars entirely, not just into smaller ones!

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

No, it probably wouldn’t have happened in the first place, because the driver of a sensibly-sized car can see things that are less than fifty fucking feet ahead of the dash.

Monstrous behemoths like this should be prohibitively expensive to own for personal use and/or be restricted to industrial/ag use only. Fuck your camping or hauling one chair or whatever the fuck you do twice a year. You can rent for something that seldom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

They are last time I checked “prohibitively expensive” but people are dumb enough to pay $100k over 8 year financing. These things are also no better for “industrial/ag” then a truck from 30 years ago that was 4 feet less tall, had an 8 foot bed and a similar towing capacity at a fraction of the price.

These things are the crystallization of our hubris.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Part of “prohibitively expensive” would mean that such financing arrangements would not be legal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

No, it probably wouldn’t have happened in the first place, because the driver of a sensibly-sized car can see things that are less than fifty fucking feet ahead of the dash.

[X] doubt

If big trucks were banned, muderous MAGA psychopaths would just mow down cyclists using Dodge Chargers or whatever instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m pretty fucking far as anti-car sentiment goes but to think that a meaningful amount of cyclists killed via cars is people doing it intentionally is insane. You can kill a man dead in a Smart ForTwo easily but let’s not pretend the giant driving blind spots and especially the cultural messaging that goes along with HUGE ANGY TRUCK (/ CAR) doesn’t help

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

The thing is, they are materially worse than other consumer vehicles. They do all the bad things but more, and their normalization makes it all worse for everyone – have you seen the size of parking spaces in Europe?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

they are materially worse than other consumer vehicles

Not in the way that actually matters, which is their effect on low-density zoning and minimum parking requirements. A parking space is a parking space is a parking space — they’re all (roughly) the same size!

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Have you never had to street park a vehicle or are you a complete moron?

2023 Dodge ram 3500 shortest length is 232", longest is 260.8". 2023 VW golf is 168.9".

That’s over 5 feet longer at minimum and over 7.5 feet longer at worst. That’s a huge amount of wasted space.

They’re wider meaning they cramp the roads horizontally as well (while driving or parked).

There’s no logical defense of these compensation-mobiles other than “I like them” and that’s fine, you’re allowed to like them. Leave it at that. They’re objectively terrible for the safety of everyone around them and are a complete waste of space.

I drove a Jeep Comanche for years and that’s as big a pickup as 99% of pickup owners would ever actually need.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

no they arent lol, you try parking one of those american cars in this city…

you can get away with owning one in the suburbs, but just parking on the side of the street like most people do? forgetaboutit

i do agree with the wider point though. get rid of all of them, nobody needs private cars. in fact, life on earth desperately needs us to ban private cars.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

There is evidence that these shit wagons are largely responsible for a major increase in pedestrian fatalities.

EVs are also a cause, because of their heavy batteries. It’s like getting hit by a tank.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
*

You know what causes pedestrian fatalities? The presence of cars of any size.

You know what eliminates pedestrian fatalities? Deleting parking lots and pedestrianizing streets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’d like to see more streets limited to people. I guess it’s hard to pull off due to politics/economics. But you can hope.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Classic

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You know what increases pedestrian fatalities? Vehicles that are too tall to reasonably see pedestrians immediately in front of you. Make better arguments instead of “trucks don’t kill people, all cars do” because it’s absolutely not equal, and there’s real reasoning as to why.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

No, not all cars are created equally. Some require much more public space and some are also much more efficient at killing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

My truck is a good boy, he wouldn’t harm a fly. It’s all about upbringing, genetics has nothing to do with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Some require much more public space

Bullshit. A subcompact takes up exactly the same “one parking space” as a truck, and is therefore just as bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

A subcompact takes up exactly the same “one parking space” as a truck

Yes, short term that is absolutely correct. What the other person meant makes more sense long term.

When parking lots are built, or design specifications are layed out, the size of cars in use is taken into account. If average car size increases, average parking lot size follows. Just recently I heard that parking lot size has to increase due to the increase in car sizes, driven by SUV popularity.

There are also parking situations where there are no discrete parking spaces, but one continuous space to park, for example along a street. In these situations, bigger cars directly translate to more space being occupied.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

“one parking space” is not a universal measurement unit, they come in many different sizes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Fuck cars but trucks and SUVs are more dangerous than cars to pedestrians, and to argue otherwise just makes you look silly

https://youtu.be/jN7mSXMruEo?t=521

active disinformation campaign at worst

Relax

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

This community is so fucking funny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes, it is funny that folks here apparently just want to circlejerk scapegoating big trucks while downvoting any actual urbanist who dares to point out that they’re focusing on the wrong problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I just wish that those of you with actually good points were capable to conveying it without coming across as a fucking insane person.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I find as cars get either bigger or more expensive or both, the driver’s get proportionally more reckless, ignorant, and entitled. It’s always the big trucks, bmw’s, and teslas that seem intent on running me off the road or flat when I’m biking to work. I don’t know about the more recent ones but the early Prius I rented on a vacation before had shit visibility so I wouldn’t give that one a free pass at least. All this shit seems so futile though. I just want the jumbo sidewalks with a bike lane to be everywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

All this shit seems so futile though. I just want the jumbo sidewalks with a bike lane to be everywhere.

Sidewalks and bike lanes don’t get used unless (a) destinations are packed closely enough together for enough trips to be in reasonable walking or cycling distance, and (b) the experience is reasonably pleasant (i.e., not a no-man’s-land sandwiched between a stroad and a bunch of parking lots).

In other words, it’s the zoning that has to be fixed first, by increasing density and removing minimum parking requirements.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fuck Cars

!fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

Create post

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

  • to raise awareness around the dangers, inefficiencies and injustice that can come from car dependence.
  • to allow a place to discuss and promote more healthy transport methods and ways of living.

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn’t choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don’t use slurs. You can laugh at someone’s fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don’t post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn’t a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

Community stats

  • 2.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 641

    Posts

  • 12K

    Comments