You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-5 points

Teslas need to crack the windows before you open the door, that’s why they complicate the door release. If you don’t give the computer a moment to move the window before the door opens you can damage things.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Tesla isn’t the only manufacturer of doors with frameless windows. They are the only ones I know of who have electric-only door latches.

The computer can have the window cracked before the handle is fully pulled. And if it fails to do so, the door opens anyway.

A better solution is a fucking window frame.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

My car has frameless windows. But they don’t need the window to be in any particular place. Literally 100% up or down, and the door works fine. I don’t understand why they designed cars that have this problem.

But yeah, framed windows work great too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why is that obvious design flaw relevant?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Thank you for giving the explanation, but I think you’re getting flamed for it because it sounds like you’re saying that decision makes sense.

They introduced the design constraint. They can remove it, or work around it mechanically. They chose not to, and instead made a death-trap on purpose. I’m sure they had their reasons at the time, but they are by definition bad reasons if they led to this outcome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He’s getting flamed because convertibles have been doing frameless door windows forever with manual overrides. It’s not something super special Tesla has done. Musk just doesn’t want to spend the extra money doing it right.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They chose not to, and instead made a death-trap on purpose

I don’t think it’s a death-trap “on purpose,” but it’s def a death-trap by negligence. Which is still bad. Very very bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So just like any convertible?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

“They had to work around a shitty design flaw with another flaw.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Didn’t bmw have this in the 90s…?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Yep, people who don’t know cars arguing about car stuff, I hate it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Those cars still had door handles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You keep pointing out the design flaw, but I think we are aware that its a flawed design.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.zip

Create post

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Use original link

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.6K

    Posts

  • 10K

    Comments

Community moderators