It’s been nice to see ordinary Americans open up to life in China but everyone is acting blind to their censorship. Makes me thankful for the fediverse and being able to self host my own instance.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
10 points

Fully agree! Thanks for putting my thought into much better words.

The only issue I see now is how to surpass bad mods and admins? The balance between filtering off topic or bad content versus anything goes but then nazis come out seems to be a challenge plus power tripping.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I just don’t understand why it’s a problem that the nazis come out. Would we not rather they utter their opinions in the open so they can be refuted? That way people can also just ignore that user if they don’t like viewing what he has to say.

It’s not like they don’t exist just because we ban them here… They’ll go somewhere to discuss where only other people who agree with them is allowed to be.

Unless we’re talking direct threats or doxing I’m always an advocate for free speech online.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Would we not rather they utter their opinions in the open so they can be refuted?

It’s far easier to lie than it is to correct a lie. When the Nazis come out into the open they spew a stream of lies in minutes that can take months to refute, leaving the field to the lies to spread and fester.

And that’s even assuming you think refutation works at all. (Protip: it works so rarely that you can treat instances where it did as statistical aberration.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Try one of their lines and I’ll refute it in 2 sentences…

None of what you said is a good argument for censorship in my opinion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Nazi punks, fuck off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I used to think this way, but no. Nazis should be shunned and banned and feel unwelcome everywhere. No one should ever think their rhetoric is harmless or ignorable. Those who tolerate Nazis enable them.

And yeah, folks can wring their hands about slippery slopes and where we draw lines, but the beauty of federation is that if someone is too loose or too draconian, we can go somewhere with more agreeable policies. We can decide as a society where the line is drawn, and it’ll be fuzzy but as speech gets closer to Naziism, it will be rejected more and more places, as it should be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points
*

I never said to tolerate them or not let them know why their ideology is fucked up.

The problem with your statement or at least how other people act on those same thoughts is that the cut off for when someone is a nazi becomes less and less.

I was called a nazi sympathiser and banned from a sub lemm.ee for asking if being against DEI equals being a nazi now.

Nobody wanted to even discuss it. They just assume the very worst of you, call you a nazi and then ban you.

That’s how you end up with echo chambers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Well said

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

That’s a never-ending process of everyone voting and discussing where the line is and where it should be.

There is no “final” solution, instead the solution is for people to collectively and continiously keep solving it every day.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Casual Conversation

!casualconversation@lemm.ee

Create post

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won’t be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There’s a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it’s vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a “controversial” message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a “spammy” message must be applicable to four purple answers before it’s allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it “would be a copyright violation if the info was art” as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar’s Number) or less, it’s considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

Community stats

  • 3.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 720

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments