It’s been nice to see ordinary Americans open up to life in China but everyone is acting blind to their censorship. Makes me thankful for the fediverse and being able to self host my own instance.

45 points

This is it. Self hosting, federation, not for profit is the way. We need an internet that is made by just regular people for no better reason than it’s fun. Not just social media either. We need an entire open internet, free and clear of all ulterior motives (or more likely still having bad actors mixed in, but at least they’re not pulling any strings at the upper levels).

I don’t know how possible that is, but I know we need it.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Fully agree! Thanks for putting my thought into much better words.

The only issue I see now is how to surpass bad mods and admins? The balance between filtering off topic or bad content versus anything goes but then nazis come out seems to be a challenge plus power tripping.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

That’s a never-ending process of everyone voting and discussing where the line is and where it should be.

There is no “final” solution, instead the solution is for people to collectively and continiously keep solving it every day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I just don’t understand why it’s a problem that the nazis come out. Would we not rather they utter their opinions in the open so they can be refuted? That way people can also just ignore that user if they don’t like viewing what he has to say.

It’s not like they don’t exist just because we ban them here… They’ll go somewhere to discuss where only other people who agree with them is allowed to be.

Unless we’re talking direct threats or doxing I’m always an advocate for free speech online.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I used to think this way, but no. Nazis should be shunned and banned and feel unwelcome everywhere. No one should ever think their rhetoric is harmless or ignorable. Those who tolerate Nazis enable them.

And yeah, folks can wring their hands about slippery slopes and where we draw lines, but the beauty of federation is that if someone is too loose or too draconian, we can go somewhere with more agreeable policies. We can decide as a society where the line is drawn, and it’ll be fuzzy but as speech gets closer to Naziism, it will be rejected more and more places, as it should be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Nazi punks, fuck off.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Would we not rather they utter their opinions in the open so they can be refuted?

It’s far easier to lie than it is to correct a lie. When the Nazis come out into the open they spew a stream of lies in minutes that can take months to refute, leaving the field to the lies to spread and fester.

And that’s even assuming you think refutation works at all. (Protip: it works so rarely that you can treat instances where it did as statistical aberration.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I’ve noticed a very pro-China shift on Lemmy since Trump became president. Yeah, Trump is awful, but it’s not like that makes China or Russia better. It makes them all bad.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

That started well before he became president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

China is good actually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Pro or anti X nation state rhetoric is rarely helpful. I fully agree that blind support of another country just because it’s not the US is just silly. I don’t know what you mean by all bad. How’re you labeling all three of those countries?

Have you been to China? The thing that is affecting so many US users on xiaohongshu is waking up to how many aspects of Chinese daily life and society are actually better than the supposed best country in the world. This has been my experience on my most recent of many times in China. It shocking how many issues and stressors exist in America that don’t in China.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t know what you mean by all bad. How’re you labeling all three of those countries?

Do you have your head under a rock? Over the past few years China has been putting the Uighur people in concentration camps while Russia has been invading and genociding Ukrainians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The westerner that has never been to China and doesn’t speak a word of mandarin is gonna lecture us on China.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

ZENZ ZENZ ZENZ

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No, China hasn’t. There has been no evidence.

We know how much information should get out of a state with complete control over the flow of information, via Palestine and Ukraine’s respective genocides. Instead of any of that, we have vague, contradictory accusations from Islamic extremists. The uighur people control Xinjiang, and thanks to investment it’s flourishing.

China killed Islamic extremism via education and improving material conditions; that’s not acceptable to the West, so they made up a story.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No, because I don’t fall for the propaganda. I’ve met one of the NYT reporters on that and their sources were three Ugyhurs and trust me. I’m guessing you don’t speak Chinese and have zero knowledge of it besides MSN?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

It shocking how many issues and stressors exist in America that don’t in China.

Youth unemployment, falling birth rates, spotty healthcare infrastructure, bad working conditions

Which ones does China not have?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Great whataboutism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I think to each their own. My wife spent two weeks in China for work, and she’s still traumatized from it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You definitely need to tell us what happened with your wife. Can’t just write something like that and leave it hanging!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I think to each their own. My wife spent two weeks in China for work, and she’s still traumatized from it.

What

Edit: oh his wife just can’t handle new experiences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

China is pretty sensitive about depictions of Mao, so it doesn’t surprise me.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Ironically enough it’s actually super popular in China to “Rent-a-Mao” or Chiang Kai-Shek or whoever else from China’s modern history. There are a lot of Mao impersonators, just like we have impersonators of Elvis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Even positive ones? But what’s up with that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

It’s like how companies don’t like satirical use of their trademarks even if positive. Brand control. Or for China, propaganda control. They don’t want you to get comfortable using jokes about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Xiaohongshu does not tolerate political posts altogether, from what I read

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Surprising to me too, it was a positive depiction of Mao.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m not really sure, it may be to do with how Jiang Zemin got called toad boy a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s largely cultural. China is a place where filial piety is import so anything that can be construed as disrespect for your forbearers is looked down upon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

That app doesn’t like gambling, politics, or sexually explicit material.

Your post probably fell under politics.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Posting anything about any Chinese leader is verboten.

permalink
report
reply

Weird. Weird how I post about Chinese leadership quite often on Weibo and haven’t been canned.

Here’s a thought: maybe it’s how you go about it that counts?

Criticism of Mao in particular is perfectly cromulent here. The Party itself criticizes Mao, especially for the Cultural Revolution, with some fairly harsh language.

But if you don’t know how to do it or when, then … ah … yeah, you’re going to get people pissed off at you.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Casual Conversation

!casualconversation@lemm.ee

Create post

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you’ll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won’t be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There’s a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it’s vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a “controversial” message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a “spammy” message must be applicable to four purple answers before it’s allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it “would be a copyright violation if the info was art” as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar’s Number) or less, it’s considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

Community stats

  • 3.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 705

    Posts

  • 16K

    Comments