Donald Trump has suggested large numbers of Palestinians should leave Gaza to “just clean out” the whole strip, after ordering the US military to restart shipments of 2,000lb bombs to Israel.

The US president said he wanted Gaza residents to move to neighbouring nations, and that they could be displaced “temporarily or could be long-term”, after a phone call with Jordan’s King Abdullah on Saturday.

“I said to him: I’d love you to take on more because I’m looking at the whole Gaza Strip right now and it’s a mess, it’s a real mess. I’d like him to take people,” Trump said, when asked about the call.

He also suggested Egypt as a destination for Gaza residents, and said he would raise the issue with President Abdel Fatah al-Sisi on Sunday.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
220 points

Reeeeeeeeeally hard to stop my self from screaming “I fucking told you so” to all the idiots who insisted Trump would be better for the situation right now

This is literally the exact thing I’ve been trying to point out for months

permalink
report
reply
21 points

https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/israel-gaza-palestinians-concept-paper-1.7015576

The plan was always their. They would get away with it even if it was biden or harris would won

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

It was Israel’s plan yes, not official us policy like now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What would you make think biden or harris would have blocked such a plan?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Is there a difference?

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Nobody I know thought Trump would be better for Gaza. Just that Genocide is the worst situation and it was already being ignored.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

But now we get more death! Immigrants, trans people, FEMA, it’s like a Gatcha game of who else gets to suffer. We really taught them a lesson

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

The dem leadership knew the whole time exactly how to win the election but werent willing to pay the price in thwarting AIPAC to secure that win. All they had to do was recognize the genocide a few days before the election and follow existing laws on it, and acknowledge that many Americans are struggling. They chose to roll the dice instead.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If you’re willing to let one group be subject to genocide, then all groups are eligible. You know how it goes, “first they came for[…]”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Why have to bother yourself with harm reduction when you can choose to do nothing and passively allow things to get worse? That would be asking too much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Maybe geopolitics is more complicated than the anti-Kamala protest voters have been lead to believe…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It certainly is. Unfortunately for all of us, it’s more complicated than the Dems and “lesser of two evil” voters (of which I was one) have been lead to believe as well.

Or they would have… you know… Won.

But hey, if we want to learn the wrong lesson from this again, far be it from me to stop us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If your “complicated” world view means justifying genocide then it’s just a justification of murder.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

A lot of people here on lemmy believe fiercely that both sides were equally bad about it, and it is exactly that sentiment that led to 6.6 Million former DNC voters staying home while a fascist took power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

In the swing states the economy did actually poll higher among people who stayed home. Gaza polled highest nationwide but ultimately would not matter until Michigan. She lost because she let corporate advisors run 140+ different messages instead of focusing on the few issues that people cared about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Which could’ve been avoided if Harris had taken a stronger stance on Gaza.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Yeah, no what led to 13 million (not 6 million) former DNC voters staying home was:

  1. Being lied to & gaslit about Biden’s condition.
  2. Kamala hiding from interviews where she might get asked tough questions.
  3. Kamala sending out Mark Cuban to tell everyone how much she loved big corporations.
  4. Kamala claiming she couldn’t think of anything she’d do different than Biden, other than having a Republican in her cabinet… while parading around with Liz Cheney & praising Dick Cheney.
  5. Spending 2 billion on her campaign, giving a lot of it to right-wing networks for advertising despite them overwhelmingly supporting Trump & to people like Oprah & Al Sharpton to pretend that they were giving fair interviews.
  6. Attacking other progressive candidates, like when she endorsed & paid for the ads to go after Jill Stein.
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What pisses me off is even if they WERE equally bad about it, trump is clearly worse on a dozen other extremely important issues. So why throw away all of that for a single issue? If “genocide” is the thing, what about caring about Ukrainians? Central and South Americans and LGBT in the US? Poor, disabled people and veterans? Wildlife? Children who live near industry? Why throw all those people under the bus while getting someone who is the same or worse about Palestine? It makes no sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Genocide is the worst situation

Very obviously a false dichotomy.

Do you think Palestinians wanted Trump to win?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They want peace. Harris made no move to say she would stop the genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Trump is worse for saying the quiet part out loud, but the actions by all administrations since the establishment of israel show that this plan by israel is being followed regardless of what the president says out loud.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Because trump is more vocal, resistance and people could better predict what he could do and try to organize and find way to stop him even partially

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

I don’t think that matters. Israeli officials themselves have said their plans out loud. It’s already well known that they’re going for a full ethnic cleansing which includes genocide and mass relocation because they want all of Palestine and more (which they refer to as “Greater Israel”). There have been some actions taken, including by the ICC (which Biden wrote off as “outrageous”) and all those student protests which were forcibly silenced. Ultimately we need someone with power to do something. Trump certainly won’t do anything to stop it, in fact he openly encourages it. Sadly democrats won’t do anything either, even if they’re more silent on the subject or let a small handful of democrats speak out a bit (but not too much, or they get censured).

The US is the biggest power behind Israel and no one dares stand up to the US. If both of the biggest parties (and only ones that will ever get any power) agree to not do anything to stop it, then it will just continue getting worse and worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

They can still argue that situation is better now but it depends upon a very specific meaning of “better” that doesn’t consider the Palestinian people’s welfare at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Saying, “I told you so” has zero effect. This people didn’t reason themselves into their positions and will refuse any reason that would cause them to change their minds.

It was clear months ago these were smart people. Their utter lack of doubt continues to be the reddest of flags.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Good point; The message may be undercut by the grammar. Effect is a noun/adjective. Affect is a verb/adverb.

Disregard if you were actually trying to state that the concept of the number zero goes out and affects people in some unspecified way whenever that statement is spoken.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

How would Kamala have been better for Palestine?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Why didn’t you have an issue with it at any point in the past 15 months?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I did. I still do. What’s your point?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You sure? It sure seems like your first thought here is “how can I rub this in the faces of those i feel like blaming for this” judging by your comment. You seem to want to retroactively remove Biden and Harris’ culpability in bringing us to this point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

He secured a ceasefire, which is more than Biden could do. But ultimately, is he better? I don’t think so. I’m not sure he’s any worse, either. I wish we had better options.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He did not secure a ceasefire.

Note that the ceasefire is literally identical to the one the US Department of State proposed the better part of a year ago. The ceasefire was enacted now, and not before, for reasons of political timing, nothing more. This falls in the same category as Nixon when when he pulled a very similar ploy with Vietnam.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

He did not secure a ceasefire.

The ceasefire was enacted now, and not before, for reasons of political timing, nothing more.

Wait…so, who’s responsible for the ceasefire? If it was Biden, why did he choose to do it after Trump got elected? What kind of “political timing” is that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

If it was enacted now because of Trump, then he is the reason it passed.

Ergo he secured it.

He may be a piece of shit with nothing material to add, but his endorsement did move this ceasefire forwards.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Also the same category as Reagan’s election and the embassy hostages + Iran contra affair. It’s part of the standard republican playbook now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He’s certainly worse, Biden didn’t piss off Canada and Mexico immediately.

I can’t really speak on internal US policies, i.e. whether Biden’s inaction or Trump’s wild actions are overall worse for the nation but internationally, Trump is far far far worse.

It’s not even a competition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’m talking about Palestine only.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points
*

Hur dur genius nostradamus here.

Nobody who watched genocide joe support genocide for over a year had any hope for 2025 and beyond.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-36 points

Few people argued for Trump being better. Biden bombed Gaza to rubble. Trump comes in and does the paperwork. Biden is not absolved.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

In no way shape or form am I defending Biden here. His position was indefensible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Biden didn’t bomb Gaza genius.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

I must have imagined those American bombs dropped by American made planes being sent by Biden.

He asked Netanyahu nicely to not carpet bomb Gaza with them. That absolves him of it all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

When I was younger I played Skyrim, it seemed very unrealistic that NPCs though the wind shot them with an arrow, but seeing you I think they had quite good AI actually

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 19K

    Posts

  • 302K

    Comments