You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
95 points

I guess all the “Genocide Joe” commenters aren’t getting paid to skew the election anymore, so they won’t be here to comment.

permalink
report
reply
48 points
*

I haven’t seen “Genocide Don” yet. Funny that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Isn’t Trump’s middle name James? Genocide James works. And you could Photoshop him trying to look cool, like dark Brandon. But obviously just sad like some 60 year old trying to look cool at the barbeque and failing miserably, but even worse because he’s older… And trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s John (which also happens to be a pseudonym he’s used). You could say “Genocide John,” but nobody would know who you’re talking about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That’s because Trump only just got in and hasn’t (yet) done anything close to what Biden did in terms of genocide

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

They’re still around unfortunately, but they are fewer in number.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Just check the downvote total to see how many accounts are still here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The bots left, we’re left with the dumbasses who believed them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Bro did you see that articicle about the x whistleblower and how elon influenced the election

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I hadn’t; any source, by chance (or summarization, if not)?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

There are a few stragglers around still. And just as sanctimonious with their tiresome and reckless high-flying rhetoric about how principled they are…

sigh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Or, and this is crazy, Biden could have earned more votes for the DNC by using the Leahy Law and requiring Israel to stop committing war crimes if they wanted to continue to receive military aid.

Almost like it’s the responsibility of parties and politicians to earn votes in a democratic system. Not the duty of voters to vote for the “correct” party, which is what you see codified in Authoritarian governments. The writers of our Constitution specifically said the reason for having elections so often was to make sure politicians were responsible to the people, not the other way around.

So the more you try to blame the voters, the more you make them not want to vote blue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Genocide Joe. Genocide Trump. Feel better? I dont.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Hi I am here. I called Biden “Genocide Joe” because frankly that is an accurate label.

I am here commenting that I already have and will continue to shit on Trump for being a genocidal bigot.

Now can you proceed to take your foot out of your mouth?

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I’m right here. Trump is gearing up to act as genocidal as Biden was but he’s not there yet

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Most of the genocide Joe commenters were russian bots. Those left were fooled by them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

BlueAnon in full force

permalink
report
parent
reply
-26 points

I’m here. Biden is a genocidal monster, and nothing Trump can do will change that fact.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

.ml user with a braindead take? yeah, that checks out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

So you don’t think Biden was complicit in the genocide? The one he funded?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Its braindead to not support a genocider?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Yeah, you can’t get away with critising Dear Leader Biden on .world

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Good, keep making yourself known so we know who to ignore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You will ignore someone for calling a genocider a genocider?

Ok.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Block me then

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“hmm, funny how all the people criticizing genocide Joe disappeared”

“No we didn’t, are right here”

“Blocked”

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Block me dumbass

permalink
report
parent
reply
-32 points

I only started using the term after the election, I wish I was paid. It’s crazy how I’m expected to shut up about it for the next 4 years. Apparently, asking the dems to change their stance on genocide of everything is too much and everyone would rather stick their head in the sand. The moment someone enables it just a bit more then them, they get none of the blame and we get to wait through 4 years of shit just for them to give us literally the same stance.

Both parties enable it and are complicit. Defending either on the subject is clear bootlicking imo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

No one is defending either on the subject. We are simply stating that one is WORSE than the other by an order of magnitude. Honestly, how can you not see that?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

It’s not just that he’s much worse it’s that some people somehow expected him to be better?!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Not only that, but if you took them at their word, that donvict and Kamala would have been the eXaCtSaMe on Gaza, then that issue is cancelled out and you have to weigh all the other policy positions, and even then, it is clear that donvict is a TERRIBLE choice compared to Kamala.

They have no excuse. None.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I see a lot of people actively defending Biden in this very thread

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

His comment implies anyone speaking disfavorably about the dems stance on genocide is somehow a paid shill.

Read the rest of the comments. It’s always the same thing. The dems lost because the voters got manipulated into thinking genocide was something to draw a line over. Well it fucking was. I still think not voting and voting for Trump of all people is massively stupid but I hate the message we are sending.

Trump isn’t worse, he’s the same on it. We shouldn’t be calling them anything other then Genocide Joe and Genocide Trump. Biden did a lot of good but his whole legacy is not breaking with genocide.

We have 4 years to exert pressure and make sure the next candidate isn’t a mossad and wallstreet plant. Instead we are infighting like peasants and trying are hardest to not hold the politicians who are suppose to represent us accountable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

There are a disturbing number of people in this thread who feel that condemning Democrats is more important than worrying about what is about to happen to Palestinians.

As if you folks were using genocide as a tool. And it’s pretty hard to read.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

condemning Democrats is more important than worrying about what is about to happen to Palestinians.

Well, if we want to take it this way…

Yes, Trump’s open declaration of supporting a genocide in Palestine is just as bad as when Biden did it. They are both fucking ghouls, and I hope they both join Kissinger, Reagan, and Thatcher soon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

When you dismiss people condemning the democrats, you essentially send the message that enabling genocide is okay.

I see attacking the voters as a zionist dog whistle, to desensitize on the subject and low key make genocide something that can be overlooked for the “right” reasons.

Insulting to be said I’m using it as a tool. Every thread about it, there’s multiple comments talking about the voters and using them as a scapegoat. I’m just responding to them. If I’m using it as a tool, so are you. And you are a lot more vocal about it then me.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 25K

    Posts

  • 623K

    Comments