See the above edit.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
2 points
*

We need sign up barriers at the least. As well as community creation barriers. I’m at the point where I’m willing to be the one to be rude on Mastodon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

One idea I had would be that they could require accounts to have SDF emails, that would basically require people to have Validated TTY accounts, I believe social.sdf.org does this. They could also accomplish the same thing by closing registration completely and having it be solely managed via the Maint command in the TTY shell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This is a brilliant idea. It keeps the instance to the people that use the service as well as weeds out trolls. I’m not sure how feasible it is, but if anyone can, I’m sure that people that have kept a system alive since 1987 can.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yes, a validated TTY account is required for social.sdf.org

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’re right. I think that Lemmy was, at most, an afterthought. We’ve had to wake up the admins to the fact that there is a substantial number of people here and that their easy sign up policies here can easily be abused.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m surprised that more of their services aren’t like that. I mean they should be, but for some reason they aren’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply

sdfpubnix

!sdfpubnix@lemmy.sdf.org

Create post

Fans of SDF

Community stats

  • 358

    Monthly active users

  • 187

    Posts

  • 1.8K

    Comments

Community moderators