You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
8 points

They also found that there’s people over 200, so that default date thing doesn’t really explain it all.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

It’s because that explanation isn’t correct. The real deal is you just have entries without a death date, so if you ran a query this get super old ages as a result.

Note that isn’t a database of payments or even people eligible for them, just a listing of ‘everyone’ with a SSN. There is a separate master death index. In the old days, wild west kind of stuff people would disappear so the death date would never get entered. Modern days every morgue and funeral home has to legally notify SS when someone dies, there is a specific form and major hell to pay if you don’t do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Social Security numbers were first issued in 1937. You would have need someone to be over 110 in 1937 to have an age over 200. I think that it’s a combination of birthdays entered wrong plus no official death date.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Wouldn’t matter anyway the ss admin automatically stops pay and initiates audit for anything over 115.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I think those are related to survivor benefits. Like an old man marrying a young woman in the 40’s. Like the civil war vets marrying woman in the 20th century. The last civil war widow was getting benefits until she died in 2020. But still the same basic issue.

But in that case the old man isn’t getting benefits but just is needed as a reference for the person actually getting them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*

Also a lot of people between 110 and 150, so I’m sure there is a larger answer.

However, Social Security cuts off at 115, and they supposedly found like 10 million people older than that. Considering there are only ~50m people on Social Security, and the database they were searching wasn’t even about current recipients, most people would conclude that there is likely an error in data, rather than immediately jump to fraud. Of course, ketamine is a hell of a drug and Elon is not most people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s definitely still concerning if the database has a large number of errors. But systematic fraud would be much worse ofc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

the database doesn’t have to necessarily be accurate if there’s other checks - a flag for test data, a system that checks the person is real against another database before dispersing funds etc

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Lol why bring drugs into this? Specifically ketamine?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Enough Musk Spam

!enoughmuskspam@lemmy.world

Create post

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

Community stats

  • 6.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 531

    Posts

  • 9.6K

    Comments