Support policies and legislation that targets industry.

Recognize that your individual efforts are less than a drop in the ocean next to industrial contributions.

Just love your life and try to be happy.

A better comparison would be if the menu at the restaurant had AI art on it. It doesn’t matter, I’m not there for the menu art. The menu is not the main product I’m there to consume. It’s the food. The menu art is there to give a quick visual and because it looks marginally better than a blank piece of paper, nothing more. Whether it was painted by an artist or created in 2 minutes by someone with Stable Diffusion makes no difference in the food quality.

If people are really losing money because others no longer want to use their work for meaningless article headers, I don’t know what to say. Maybe get in line with phone operators and VCR repair men?

Congratulations, you are indeed not the target audience!

Unlikely. There would be very little, if any, interference with signals unless they were extremely precise. The issue is physical stuff getting destroyed by debris.

Think of a very light sprinkling of rain, but imagine if every raindrop was solid and moving faster than a bullet. Walking out in it would be deadly, but likely wouldn’t affect your cell phone service. Well, besides the tower itself and every structure in the area getting absolutely shredded.

Isn’t that kinda what AI images should be used for? Meaningless stock images? Like, if the article was about a specific person, or an interesting activity or place, then yea that’s not for AI. But a generic article about “jobs” seems fine.

Do the flowers get pollinated? That seems like the important part.

Arent those conflicting statements? How can they be taking up all the pollen AND be worse pollinators?

People always seem to forget that faux fur is less eco-friendly.

People very rarely survive significant burns. I know the article says 50/50, but he is essentially dead. The infection risk is just too high.