They praise Elon for like a solid 30 minutes. Hinkle says he loves everything about Elon except for working with Netanyahu. Errol Musk describes Israel as an ideal society, says that Israel is “civilized”. Both say that they hate the South Africa ANC.
“secured relief for Gaza” is in reference to Errol Musk claiming that he gave Elon’s Starlink to Hamas.
https://xcancel.com/jacksonhinklle/status/1920948402424090709
This was after they tried to takeover CPUSA, but got kicked out.
screaming slurs at a meeting is literally the farthest thing from trying to take over a party. they couldn’t even take over a book club
didnt they actually manage to take over PCUSA (and now it’s dead, havent heard or seen anything from them even online in what seems like forever)
no. the hazite shitstains and their larouchite buddies did the PCUSA a favor by purging themselves. (which is also what happened as we saw in CPUSA too lmao) The party’s membership primarily consist of labor organizers, trade unionists, teachers, and workers now. Problem is that those kinds of people tend to be terminally offline kinds of people (because actually being a worker and trying to be a communist organizer actually takes up a lot of your time) and really suck at advertising the fact they still exist.
Funny enough this is something I notice from all parties, the time and presence of a party existing online tends to correlate to the inverse in meatspace.
fair enough, never read enough about pcusa and only saw drama about the infrared cult invading them. why did they decide to give up on pcusa and start their own party? was there an inciting incident or they just never got any real traction and decided to give up?
I don’t know the exact details of what happened. I’m saying what Haz Al-din claimed his intentions were. He says that he told his followers to join CPUSA to “change the party line” (ie takeover) and then the party began to ban people who associated with him.
The reason why I told my followers to join the CPUSA is because having disagreements with the ideological, strategic or even programmatic line with the party is not sufficient grounds for abandoning it.
As Stalin pointed out, the Communist way is to submit to the will of the majority of the party, however erroneous it may be regarded by you individually.
The point is that through internal discussions and dialogue, you may have an opportunity to argue on behalf of the correctness of your position, in order to persuade others and ultimately change the party line.
This is the point of democratic centralism: To make the party as an institution responsive to changes and nuances concerning the will of the majority, while simultaneously enforcing submission to the outcome of that will.
So even when the party decided to undemocratically and unconstitutionally pursue a policy of trying to ban members affiliated with ‘Infrared,’ I continued to tell my followers to hold out, to stay in the party and follow its rules and procedures, and conceal their views.