Plebbit is a fully peer-to-peer, decentralized alternative to Reddit Built on IPFS that doesn’t rely on centralized servers or federated instances like Lemmy or Mastodon. Instead of traditional infrastructure, .No single point of failure, no global mods with ultimate control, no admin backdoors.
In theory, this should mean true censorship resistance and user ownership of content. Communities (subplebbs) are moderated locally with cryptographic keys, and moderation actions are transparent and accountable. It’s a different model than just “federated social media” this is more like BitTorrent for discussion forums.
Do you think a system like this can scale in practice?
Can it maintain quality discussions without centralized moderation?
Will regular users adopt something this technical?
Is it really more decentralized than alternatives, or just differently centralized?
i get that part, and i appreciate that you devs are here answering questions. i just don’t understand how that will work if people who have already seen the content still have it cached and can help seed it. or am i understanding that wrong?
There will be no way for new people to discover the purged content through the community itself.
Now, if you had the CID of a purged content and there are people seeding it to you, then yes Plebbit functions like any P2P network in which anyone can fetch a content that’s seeded by somebody
right, so it still exists, it’s just not associated with me. idk if i’d be comfortable running something like that.
99.99% of cases won’t matter because most people won’t seed random content forever. If the sub owner purge it from their node, I highly doubt anybody else would come across it unless there’s like a group dedicated to seeding and sharing removed content
