You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-2 points

It certainly isn’t capitalist to have such an insane gap between offer and supply

Sure it is! Capitalists just do it in the opposite direction; keep supply low so prices stay high.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

No, that’s an effect of collusion and cartelization of the economy. It’s because you have very few actors supplying the product and the barriers of creating a similar product are too high, so new competitors cannot access the market. Then the current suppliers can sit on the product and wait for it to be at the right price, as long as it doesn’t go to waste.

As you can see, all of this screens about real estate:

  • Cartelization/collusion: The aren’t that many companies that have properties on sale
  • High cost to enter: Building is pricey, and it depends on the location of the property more than anything. So a building in one neighborhood is not a direct replacement of a building in another neighborhood.
  • Real estate does not go to waste. Unless bad luck or poor choices, your building should work fine for a couple of generations. And worst case scenario, the land already has a price.

This is the time when governments should intervene and come up with a proposal to solve the cartelization.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

No, that’s an effect of collusion and cartelization of the economy.

That’s just capitalism honey

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yes and no. Capitalism without regulations may bring this kind of issues. But capitalism with regulations shouldn’t. The issue is that the required regulations are not being applied or do not exist.

We should not blame or put the weight of the issue in capitalism, when we clearly know we don’t live in a perfect capitalistic world, and very few markets are like that. The issue is with politicians.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

We have a solution, it is called anti trust legislation. We need to break up all of these too large to fail organizations. It’s ridiculous that we have only a handful of major players in soo many markets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes, of course we do. We just need politicians willing to do that. I thinks that’s the most difficult part.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Oops, the businesses bought the politicians and now they won’t pass anti-trust legislation. Who could have seen this coming???

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

Uh, that organisation is generally City Hall.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

That’s wrong. In many countries boomers possess a truckload of the estate, but they don’t expect to sell it because it’s their life insurance.

It’s not cartel or collusion, it’s how society was planned by the libs over the last 50 years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

“Planned by the libs”, as if the “libs” were a single entity that have a homogeneous plan. Let’s stop giving entity to stuff that never existed and realise that there is a structural problem that occurred because of bad management of our economy and policies. Because we had mediocre actors and in some cases actors with bad faith.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Are you making up a special magical definition for “libs”? Good luck with that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 118K

    Comments