1 point
Why not? Public institutions are supposed to serve the public’s interests.
0 points
Because I don’t want to give some unelected bureaucrats the ability to discommunicate someone because they said something stupid. Public goods are meant to serve the public, even if they have bad opinions.
1 point
I think the limit should be pretty high, but I’m fine with, as an example, people who spread abject hatred being rejected by most parts of society. I think not spreading hatred against your fellows is an integral part of the social contract.
-1 points
What about someone who doesn’t think that transgender women are women? Should they be rejected by society for holding that view?
