You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

Jesus christ that’s dystopian

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s not so much dystopian as it is just buggy software

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

When buggy software is used by unreasonably powerful entities to practise (and defend) discrimination that’s dystopian…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Except it wasn’t actually launched, and they didn’t defend its discrimination but rather ended the project.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ah ok. I don’t know much about it, but I’ve heard that AI could sometimes be negative toward commonly discriminated against groups because the data that it’s trained with is. (Side note: is that true? someone pls correct me if it’s not). I jumped to the conclusion that this was the same thing. My bad

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

An AI is only as good as its training data. If the data is biased, then the AI will have the same bias. The fact that going to a women’s college was considered a negative (and not simply marked down as an education of unknown quality) is proof against the idea that many in the STEM field hold (myself included) that there is a lack of qualified female candidates but not an active bias against them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

what it did it expose just how much inherent bias there is in hiring. even just name and gender alone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That is both true and pivotal to this story

It’s a major hurdle in some uses of AI

permalink
report
parent
reply

4chan

!4chan@lemmy.world

Create post

Greentexts, memes, everything 4chan.

Community stats

  • 611

    Monthly active users

  • 235

    Posts

  • 3.8K

    Comments