You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
74 points

Regardless of semantics, and how Israel’s own actions are a very large part of the problem, you still gotta agree that Hamas is racist against Jews.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

Indeed, in other words, just as the IDF is racist against Palestinians

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I’d agree that both states are racist. It’s why I don’t really think people should support Hamas or Israel carte blanche and why you can make a case that a blank unqualified statement of “I support (Israel/Hamas)” does seem quite racist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

“Hamas vs Israel” is a category error. It’s Hamas vs Likud or Palestine vs Israel. Nobody should support Hamas or Likud. Nobody should even tolerate them. They’re both terrorist groups whose goal is genocide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It’s not racism. They are the same race. It’s religious intolerance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

“Race” for humans is a made up concept and “racism” has been used to refer to any kind of hating a group for their ethnicity. “Ethnicity” is a very ambiguously defined concept notably including shared attributes like nationality, language, history, religion, etc.

I, too, am not a fan of words being used incorrectly, but this is not an incorrect use of “racism”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

People are killing each other over land and historical grievances, not whether to call God Allah or Yahweh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Biologically speaking, there is only one human race. So, does that make the word “racism” invalid? It’s a stupid term whose origin makes no sense, but I’d argue its meaning had transcended its original linguistic root. Same for anti-“semitism”.

permalink
report
parent
reply