You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
24 points

And neither do most furries. It’s like saying gamers are fucked up because they wanna fuck Lara Croff and cosplay Let Me Solo Her. The weirdest parts of a community aren’t the only parts, or even the biggest parts. Plenty of furries just like watching Looney Tunes and Zootopia and making OCs.

The furries=sexual deviants line was what they once said about Trekkies, and it was as true then as it is now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points
*

Incorrect, most furries are attracted to animals.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30806867/

Edit: would like to clarify that I don’t have anything against furries. But saying there isn’t a sexual aspect about it, is not true.

I have a few furry friends as well, and they all are into the sexual aspect of it, one used to be a roommate, I always got a chuckle out of the animal noises they would make when having sex.

My new place is more soundproof, lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Hey, is there some reason you changed the phrase that the researchers very consistently used, which was anthropomorphic animals, which they defined in the very first sentence as being like Bugs Bunny? You get how that is not the same as looking at a living rabbit and feeling sexual arousal, right?

I guess “most furries want to fuck characters like Bugs Bunny!!” was just obvious shit everyone already knew.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

If you read my comment intead of just rage replying you would have saw the part I said I wasn’t talking about fucking animals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I didn’t say there was no sexual aspect to it, but I stand corrected that there’s some sexual aspect involved for the vast majority (at least of the men they interviewed). I wish the rest of that study wasn’t locked behind a paywall, 'cause I’m curious about the details now. I wanna know what they mean by “some aspect.” However, it’s disingenuous/misleading to say that furries are attracted to animals, as that’s zoophilia and is on the same level as pedophilia. Grouping the two together like that is like “MAPs” claiming they’re part of the LGBT. My general experience with furries is that the animal fuckers are treated on the same level as the Nazi furs.

Whenever this kind of thing comes up, though, I can’t help but think about the internet outrage from when they made Lola Bunny’s boobs smaller in the new Space Jam movie and wonder how many of those people are the same people who call furries gross, lmao.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

But saying there isn’t a sexual aspect about it, is not true.

Bruh, take anything and you can probably find a sexual aspect about it.

There’s a sexual aspect about Sports Illustrated. I’m not going to turn around and say everyone who subscribes to Sports Illustrated is a pervert.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Facts. I mean, I know I don’t need to, but I’m going to quote Rule 34 in its entirety:

If it exists, there is porn of it. No exceptions.

Take anything and I guarantee you, someone, somewhere, has sexualized it. And if not, there is Rule 35, which states

If there is no porn of it, porn of it will be made.

Some can interpret this as, “If you discover that something has no porn, you have a responsibility to make it.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The sample they used is likely not representative of the whole fandom; they only interviewed 334 furries in the study, from a fandom made of millions of people. And the participants were all male, too.

…I can’t be the only one who actually reads these things, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Well out of curiosity I checked the reddit furry sex groups, hundreds of thousands of members. But sure, the study is wrong.

As long as they aren’t into fucking animals or children, I don’t give a fuck.

I didn’t mean to offend you furries, but the sexual aspect is a huge part of it, not sure why you are in denial. https://furscience.com/research-findings/appendix-1-previous-research/summer-2020/

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

2000 is considered the perfect size for surveys. Anymore and you’re wasting resources on diminishing margins of error.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*
10 points

Put way better than I could say it, thank you. As somebody who’s been on the edge of that community for years as an artist, the hatred they get has always baffled me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I can even agree that for a lot of cartoony media, depicting people as animals can give it a really cool/cute style. A lot of people have fond memories of reading the Redwall books, which took that to a logical and mature extension. But, having close association to all of the sexual stuff is where it gets bizarre and unlikable.

I’ll even go out on a limb; I really enjoyed Lauren Faust’s My Little Pony series. I thought there was some fun, inventive writing humor, good VA, and smooth animation; for a time. But there’s undeniably a ton of people that made obsession with that series really weird.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not The Onion

!nottheonion@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome

We’re not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from…
  2. …credible sources, with…
  3. …their original headlines, that…
  4. …would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

Community stats

  • 7.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.1K

    Posts

  • 38K

    Comments

Community moderators