You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-4 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I don’t know if this is suppossed to be a meta-commentary/joke or not. I never said both of those things.

China is more suited for space coordination because of its productive capacity and cooperation with other nations. China will not seek to “own” outer space but to instead integrate space travel as a way to benefit itself and the world. China can care for its citizens, the US is quickly losing the ability/will to do so.

Why not try to reflect on the fact that the US only cares about space travel when China seems to overtake them ever so slightly?

I don’t care what you really feel about China, but to interpret my support for China leading the space field as ignorance is just projection.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

China supports it’s citizens and cooperates with the international community any better than the United States

They do though

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Is China shipping billions of dollars in weapons to Israel as they, in 3 months, have dwarfed Ukrainian civilian casualties over 2 years? No? Well…

Did China instigate a coup of Pakistan’s democratically-elected leader? No?

Is China the only country voting against the Right to Food pursuant to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (Article 25)? No?

Hm.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

If you think China supports it’s citizens

Even Atlanticists admit that China has brought ~800 million people out of poverty.

Mostly it’s people in imperialist/neocolonialist countries who think China is imperialist/neocolonialist. It’s not a popular opinion in Global South countries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Can we apply this methodology of Chinas in how they treat their neighbors, and “wont seek to “own” outer-space” and do so at the benefit of the world and compare it to how they treat Taiwan, Hong Kong, and international waters? Oh to shreds you say?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Taiwan and Hong Kong were ripped away from China by European colonists, you ignoramus. Hong Kong was occupied as a British colony after the British dominated China during the Opium Wars, you know, that century that started when China decided to ban opium since the Europeans had gotten 60% of the Chinese population addicted and Britain decided to run gun boats through the coast terrorizing and destroying until they sacked the capital, stole and destroyed priceless history, and then forced the Chinese at gun point to re-legalize the drug AND grant ALL Europeans immunity from Chinese law within the 5 major ports?

Taiwan was the last theater of the Chinese civil war until the British and US navies intervened to protect the KMT and their favored comprador, Chiang Kai Shek. They wanted to ensure another Chinese army could go back and take over from the communists eventually so they protected, funded, and armed the KMT while it prosecuted the White Terror for 40 years, killing hundreds of thousands of political dissidents and indigenous Taiwanese.

Returning Hong Kong and Taiwan to their integrated status with China is DECOLONIZATION

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No one in the region considers the South China Sea to be international waters.

Everyone just disputes who’s waters they should be. Don’t talk about things you know nothing about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 9.9K

    Posts

  • 113K

    Comments