according to @Custoslibera’s post

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
1 point

It doesn’t

There is really no need to be this stubborn. Look it up yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It does. The term liberal comes from liberalism, which was founded during the Enlightenment. It isn’t an “American” thing to tie liberalism to liberals, it’s the definition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

It’s the definition when you’re talking about liberalism for sure. But that’s not what I’m referring to. The other definition is the one which, in context, I am obviously referring to.

one who is open-minded or not strict in the observance of orthodox, traditional, or established forms or ways

With the previous definition, it is clear I am talking about leftists. Context is king.

But, lesson learned; don’t use the phrase liberal outside of a philosophical/academic context.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Leftism isn’t a vague, general synonym for “goodness,” nor does it entitled you to use terminology for a right-wing ideology as a synonym for leftism. Even in a philosophical and academic concept, you’d get a bunch of confused looks.

  1. Capitalists can be open-minded and go against tradition without being left-wing.

  2. Left vs. Right isn’t about open-mindedness or a sense of futurism, it’s about collective vs. individual ownership of the Means of Production.

  3. Using an Enlightenment term for a Capitalist ideology as a term to describe leftists is wrong.

That’s why everyone has been pointing out that you’ve been using terms incorrectly. You can either accept that you misspoke, and everyone can move on, or we will be stuck here.

permalink
report
parent
reply