You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
7 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

If you left out calling them a dingbat your point is exactly the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Transphobic shit bags are seeking out stories about Nex and seeing what they can get away with because they know it’s a really good opportunity for them to grind salt into some peoples’ wounds

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

Once again. Calling people names didn’t reinforce your point. It usually does the opposite. Your anger doesn’t make your point more poignant.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-57 points

Not really, but do go on with your transphobic remarks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Can you point out what that person said that was transphobic? From the reply it just seems like that they were pointing out that a toxicology report is something that’s fairly routine. What did I miss?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s pretty common to see transphobes wading into this sort of stuff with the same kind of arguments that racists use about police murdering black people, etc. That support of the system because the system is oppressing a minority they don’t like kind of thing where they turn a blind eye to any context.

I’m not gonna wade into that kind of debate, but to me, the big issue is what I saw somebody else say: that the police aren’t even going to consider whether or not a crime was committed until after they get the toxicology report, despite knowing that the person in question was assaulted like the day before.

Like the cops, focusing on the toxicology report alone is an easy way to erase everything else about what happened. Having a toxicology done isn’t transphobic, but focusing only on that and when it comes back clean, ruling it as a freak accident and not following up on the assault? That would be transphobic as hell and wouldn’t be the first or last time the cops did something like that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

The included insult, however mild, must be seen as an attempt to denigrate QUESTIONING the police methods, as if the environment was “obviously” fair and balanced. He might have not meant it that way, but even then it’s an example of the moderate being the true enemy of the oppressed. So it’s either a tactic, siding with a fascist system or at best inconsiderate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Was gonna upvote, but you really went overboard with the insults there so I had to upvote twice

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Lol, cockmongrel

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

When did ‘dingbat’ become transphobic?

Has ‘dingbat’ become a new epithet for trans people?

Because it apparently originally was the name of an alcoholic drink and has been used to describe a stupid person since 1905.

https://www.etymonline.com/word/dingbat

Care to tell us where you heard that the word was transphobic?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s also a style of architecture: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dingbat_(building)

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s unfortunate for the small local music and dive bar near me called dingbatz then…

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

What part of what they said is transphobic?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

OH NOW YOU TOO HUH

/s

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Impressive amount of downvotes. Troll successful, I guess

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 22K

    Posts

  • 562K

    Comments