You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

You’ve got it. Just harder lib

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

at our current rate of economic and ecological breakdown we don’t really have the time or resources to form a better structure.

Which is why we need to do a slow incrementalism by voting?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

exactly! This lib’s arguement just proves our point

permalink
report
parent
reply

burn it all down

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

it’s easier to fix the system than replace it.

If we can’t even decide on basic shit like “is the earth warming at a rate that is hostile to life” how are we supposed to form a new cohesive government? It’s going to be hard enough electing decent people to any structure you can think of.

You yourself are making our point for why liberal democracy cannot fix itself. We can’t form a “cohesive government” as you say within this system. That’s why its necessary for this system to end.

You will never be able to elect “decent people” because you, us, the people do not have a say in who they get to vote for. This government does not exist for us, and it is not a democracy for us. And it never will be, until the power of capital is broken

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply