You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
48 points

Sounds cool! Too bad it’s only on MacOS atm

permalink
report
reply
48 points

They wrote their own GUI toolkit (oof) and it’s hardware accelerated (argh), so OS portability is going to be unusually difficult unless they planned for it from the beginning. No mention of that in the article, so I doubt they did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

They already have very experimental Linux support. You have to build whole app yourself though. I’d say that in month or two we’ll get a binary. You can track Linux porting progress in this issue

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Anybody got a nix flake though?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I mean on the one hand, the hardware acceleration is awesome. The GUI toolkit is not of course (I assume MacOS has a default one to make everything look like it belongs?), but at least they made it look like a native app instead of the usual electron shit where it’s clearly a web page with a window border and some design 15y old me might think is cool but 16y old me would already have been ashamed of.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

As I understand, GUI toolkits will usually support various widget styles or “Look and Feels”.
So, they can just use a glossy graphic for a button on macOS and a flat graphic on Windows 11, without having to reimplement the whole application in the native toolkit. It will usually not feel entirely native, but at least, it won’t look out of place…

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Its already possible to build manually on linux and there’s a tracking issue.

*edit. same as the other post

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Sounds like gimp with gtk (gimp toolkit) all over again

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Edit: I’m writing this out of my ass, so don’t quote me.

They wrote that they GPU(I?)-accelerate the font rendering. Well, indeed, fonts are usually rendered with CPUs because it’s slow to use the traditional VRAM (which sits in the GPU) for this task, given that the text itself is stuck in the RAM (sitting right next to the CPU). With integrated chips like the Apple Silicon, it probably makes sense to move the font rendering into the GPU because the memory is unified. GTK is absolutely not designed to do this, AFAIK.

But that also means that, to get this particular benefit of their dedicated GUI framework, you probably have to buy an Apple Silicon Mac. There are PCs with similar architecture, iirc, but that also means that there’s no way you can upgrade your GPU or RAM individually in the future… My fear is that, on a standard PC, it might be just as responsive as other editors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Didn’t treesitter come from the Atom editor? These guys always take things really far so this isn’t surprising.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Because GTK is designed for GUI software, and this is a text editor. Almost everything is text - it’s got more in common with Vim than Gedit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I’m waiting for it to come on Linux.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How would they know a release date if they haven’t finished making it yet?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Programming

!programming@programming.dev

Create post

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person’s post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you’re posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don’t want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



Community stats

  • 3.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 26K

    Comments