You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
6 points

There was no threat made. Even if Ukraine had entered into NATO, NATO had made no noise about stationing nukes in Ukraine. It could well have kept the status of the Baltic states where they don’t have nukes stationed there. There’s really no strategic value to NATO to do so. That was an excuse made up by the Kremlin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Here you go. There’s also a video of him demanding pre-emptive nukes be used against Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Zelensky did not ask for pre-emptive nukes against Russia. That was an erroneous English translation. And I said NATO had made no noise about stationing nuclear weapons. For that matter, it’s a bit of a reach to say that Ukraine is requesting that nuclear weapons be stationed on its territory, but rather that it gave up nuclear weapons in return for an agreement that Russia has now breached.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

“But Zelenskyy’s response to a question from Lowy Institute Executive Director Michael Fullilove, who moderated the discussion, did not specifically mention nuclear weapons.”

While talking about nuclear weapons, what else does preemptive strikes mean? This is new levels of cope.

Here’s his direct threat of installing nuclear weapons.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 9.9K

    Posts

  • 113K

    Comments