i think billionaires should be shot, not sent to gulags. gulags are for non-bourgeois liberals.

People who have been fucked over by the system often adopt a position to advocate for radical system change? Wooah, very insightful. If you care about people who are negatively affected by modern systems, then that makes their opinion and lived experience more important, not less.

You even admit that the user may be targeting the right people, so your point is what? That violence is unjustifiable? That strongly believing in a cause leads to disaster? They’re not true points, but they’d be much better starting points for constructive discussion, so you can just say whatever you actually mean.

People making such pretentious, word-salad arguments as yours should not be throwing around the term ‘self-righteous asshat’.

I have nothing good going on in my life, so I’ve adopted an extreme viewpoint

Correct. Oppressed peoples tend to support “radical” movements that would improve their lives, and this is a stupid comment for trying to make that sound like a bad thing.

God are you people so fucking stupid, just a bunch of unwarranted self importance and navel gazing nonsense all crammed into a skull cavity the size of a thimble.

Please note, I’ve not made any statement on whether you’re wrong or right in your targeting. That’s a separate discussion.

LMAO

Your entire attitude fucking screams “I have nothing good going on in my life, so I’ve adopted an extreme viewpoint…”.

You mean to tell me that people who are chewed up and shat out by the current order are willing to take drastic measures and radically change the world!??!

Honestly dude if I lost a debate as hard as you did I wouldn’t be spouting this psychobabble diarrhea

“you believe in stuff and that’s bad cause I don’t believe in anything” is never the place you want to be in a discussion, you basically admitted you have no clue what the fuck you’re talking about and because your opponent does that somehow makes them mentally ill???

Seriously get a grip

My life situation is great, actually. I still think gulags are appropriate.

So are only people who are “in a good place” in their lives capable of having “extreme” political beliefs? How do you justify who is in a “good place” and who isn’t? Do you think it could ever be related to political or economic forces? Or are “extreme” political ideologies all universally forbidden? How do you qualify what is “extreme”? Are people who are not in “a good place” only able to have conservative positions that maintain status quo or are they only able to be apolitical? How do you think maintaining status quo or not having any political beliefs would help their “life situation [improve] enough” if there is no change to their politico-economic reality which directly impacts their life situation? If one is in a “good place” what kinds of political beliefs would they typically exhibit or are they allowed to have?

Your entire attitude fucking screams “I have no real political analysis but suffer from a great sense of narcissism that leads me to a false sense of intelligence which makes me think I can paternalistically psychologize others’ entire lives without knowing them so that I can justify sharing my ignorant opinions that communicate that I believe I have a better life than others do and that makes me a superior person” so that gives me hope you won’t be able to help yourself from responding further. Also happy to pay you with Hexbear gold for a similar psychological analysis and thorough breakdown of my political potential if it saves me a trip to the therapist, kind stranger. Thanks.

Have you considered kinetically prosecuting yourself?

How hard is it to have a brain-eating amoeba?