Australia’s Mona asked a court to reverse its ruling that allowed men inside a women’s only space.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/oHT6U

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
41 points

Well isn’t that about some hypocritical shit?!

From the article…

“The lounge, which contains some of the museum’s most-acclaimed works - from Picasso to Sidney Nolan - has been closed to the public since the court’s order.”

Both Pablo Picasso and Sidney Nolan were both men!

If they’re gonna play that ‘women only’ card, then they should remove all works created by men and move them to a proper open museum.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

The amount of people/men who don’t get it is astonishing. Art isn’t just something you can put on a wall. This entire thing with excluding men is an art installation, supposed to generate emotions and a discussion about exclusion and gender disparity. And seeing how many men around the world are frothing at the mouth over an installation at a small museum at the end of the world it is an extremely powerful piece of art. I applaud the museum for this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Yeah, well my late father was a painter, and his number one rule was that he didn’t paint stuff to be hidden away. One of his last wishes was to make sure people see his artworks.

It’s up to the people that view his works as to their thoughts and opinions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’re applauding a troll for trolling successfully?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Intent matters. If all you just want is to piss off people, that’s trolling. I don’t see this being the point here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I appreciate some good trolling that doesn’t actually harm anyone. And in this case it also certainly generated discussion, so I’d say it’s more than trolling anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“I was an asshole as a work of art, not because I am an asshole”

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

There are still places that are men only. Women can’t join the freemasons for example, but you don’t see this sort of extremely angry reaction to that.

And I agree, this art piece is doing exactly what it was supposed to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Do you have any more examples other than the freemasons? I had assumed we were done with needless segregation (excluding bathrooms and such).

The only thing that makes sense in my mind is that male dominated spaces have non-explicit social barriers in place that are being approximated by the explicit barrier the museum has set up.

In the UK there’s golf clubs that have pretty toxic atmospheres and dress codes but aren’t legally allowed to bar women.

Sorry if this is super ignorant, I’m acknowledging the problem I just want to understand it better

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Huh. Let women into the Freemasons, I guess?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You’re right, but to play devil’s advocate; that’s extremely unintuitive and took me to my 20s to figure out

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well, the mean age here seems to be over 30, so I’d expect a tad more maturity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

small museum at the end of the world

The end of the world is a fair description, but small is not. It is the largest privately funded museum in the Southern Hemisphere and has 6000m² (64583 ft²) of gallery space.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

You’re doing the thing the artist intended lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Point is, art is art, and a museum is a museum. Anyone mature enough should be allowed to enter any museum they want and view whatever exhibits they want.

That gender specific crap can and does end up going both ways. And it shouldn’t be that way, anywhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

In a world where there are millions of men who actually believe women are advantaged over men in today’s society, it’s interesting to see the international uproar occurring over this single exhibit that made that belief actually true. A single exhibit at a sex museum in Tasmania that’s literally about gender discrimination.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If they’re gonna play that ‘women only’ card, then they should remove all works created by men and move them to a proper open museum.

Why?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That was a sarcastic thought meant to make people think.

What they really should do is like not discriminate. It’s a museum, every person mature enough, men and women, should be welcome to go view whatever artwork and exhibits they have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Picasso was a massive misogynist, too. I haven’t any idea who Nolan is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

It didn’t take me long to research into Sidney Nolan, but at the same time I do have more and more reason by the day to doubt historical facts found online… 🤷‍♂️

permalink
report
parent
reply

Interesting Global News

!globalnews@lemmy.zip

Create post

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn’t have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title format

Post title should mirror the news source title.

URL format

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

[Opinion] prefix

Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. No social media posts

Avoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can’t argue your position without attacking a person’s character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

Community stats

  • 2.9K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.9K

    Posts

  • 15K

    Comments

Community moderators