Putin goes on to say

”Our proposal is not to freeze the conflict, like how the west wants it, but to end it. I repeat, this is not to freeze the conflict, but for its final completion.”

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

History begins in the winter of 2022 of course

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Including more history is not to Putin’s credit.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You uh

You wanna expand on that or are you going to pretend you got an epic mic drop own

Because I have no fucking clue what you’re trying to say

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No mic drop intended, just replying fast to a few people.

I guess before I figure out which way to expand on it I need a baseline, do you believe history will look fondly on Putin?

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

This doesn’t just have to do with Putin, there is no reality where any Russian president would accept Ukraine joining NATO. That has been clear since the fall of the Soviet Union.

permalink
report
parent
reply

true, Russia could have elected Karl Marx or Jesus Christ or Taylor Swift as president and they would still have responded to american provocation in similar ways. Putin is a conservative, homophobic oligarch, but just about anyone else in that position would have responded similarly to the threat of NATO nukes on their border and nazis ethnically cleansing speakers of their language. If Mexico decided to join BRICS and host Chinese nukes and militias started massacring english-speakers and anyone with american citizenship or ancestry, we would go full Iraq Invasion style and turn the entire country into rubble and irradiated craters and corpses, meanwhile Russia waited like 2 years after invading to even start targeting the electrical grid and other infrastructure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Whether or not any Russian president would have accepted it doesn’t justify invading another country with the intent of claiming the land as their own, nor does it make them any less of the aggressor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

I’m sure you’re referring to what happened with Crimea after Euromaidan, but real quick… What was Euromaidan and how come the US state department could decide who should run Ukraine? And why exactly is it so hard to believe that regions of Ukraine with a majority of ethnic Russians would vote to become part of Russia, rather than a country whose government was installed by Nazis that publicly stated they wanted to get rid of ethnic Russians in Ukraine?
Should we go further back? Back to when NATO pledged to Yeltsin not to expand further towards Russia? Or in 00’s when Russia was rejected from NATO membership (having applied after NATO expanded further towards Russia despite previous pledges).

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

lol. lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

😝

permalink
report
parent
reply

Including more history is not justification but to explain why things happen. Wtf is wrong with liberals?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

It’s like explaining to a child how babies are made and they go “no actually babies just appear out of nowhere” lmao

permalink
report
parent
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 2.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.2K

    Posts

  • 150K

    Comments