Putin goes on to say

”Our proposal is not to freeze the conflict, like how the west wants it, but to end it. I repeat, this is not to freeze the conflict, but for its final completion.”

87 points

already being reported as “Putins DEMANDS”

permalink
report
reply
92 points
*

I mean they are demands. You make demands when you have overwhelmingly dominated your opponent, which Russia has.

Russia is preparing for war with NATO. This is most likely Putins final public proposal for peace so the world can see Russia is not the aggressor in this situation. Everyone knows they’re making gains on the battlefield and the US has already publicly stated Ukraine won’t be a part of nato. So what is there to really fight about other than upholding Americas honor?

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

The screaming liberals are always making up a new reason to not accept anything. You tell them this is reasonable and they clap back with how Putin can’t be trusted because they broke the commitment to sovereignty made when they gave up their nukes. The fact that the minsk agreements were broken first doesn’t matter to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

The problem with debating liberals is that you’re trying to use truth and reality against people that care about neither of those things

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

You’re right, but that doesn’t really matter because the only step other than publicly announcing a peace agreement is to end all life on the planet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

How is Russia not the aggressor in a war they started?

permalink
report
parent
reply

History begins in the winter of 2022 of course

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points
*

The problem with informing yourself with mainstream media. Its like putin just decided to invade ukraine that morning. And he is a crazy evil dictator etc

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

In 2014 a bunch of Ukrainian nazis couped the democratically elected government and started ethnically cleansing the Russian population in the Donbas. Some sections of the Ukrainian military rebelled and formed militia units to protect the population from being murdered by nazis, leading to a low level civil war stretching on for years. Ukrainian nazi paramilitaries continued persecuting ethnic Russian Ukrainians civilians as well as shelling Donetsk and Lugansk

During this time Russia tried repeatedly to conduct diplomacy with the nazis western handlers, the US and the UK, as well as interested third parties such as Germany and France. However, it was pointless as the US never intended to back down and continuously goaded the Ukrainian nazis into attacks on the Donbas, all the while supplying them with money and weapons. When the war seemed to be escalating to the point NATO forces might join in, Russia - understanding that any actual direct combat between Russian and NATO soldiers would lead to a global nuclear holocaust - jumped in with its troops first… after spending three days voting to formally recognize the independence of the DPR and LPR, of course, because Putin is a bureaucrat to the core and these things must be done properly.

And now, the people of Donetsk and Luhansk can live quietly without fear of nazi missiles blowing up their city centers for no reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*

Cause they didn’t start the 2014 Ukranian Civil War, they’re just finishing it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

if i point a gun at your head and you attack me, who is the aggressor?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
*

Russia started the war because the west wants influence over Ukraine, which is existential for Russia. This is something the United States and NATO are already aware of, so the real question is why would nato take an aggressive posture in Ukraine knowing they cannot win a war?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Inb4 you make an edit or comment saying something like “wow so many russian shills responding to this! Guess you don’t like to get your echo chamber disturbed”.
Please educate yourself instead

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

The a in usa stands for aggressor

usa is always the aggressor

They started hundreds of wars, this one included

permalink
report
parent
reply
86 points
*

Sounda reasonable considering all the situation but western MIC oligarchs won’t let Ukraine take that deal100%

permalink
report
reply
102 points
*

This isn’t reasonable, this is crazily generous, especially considering the state of the war. Only thing Ukraine lose is places that already publicly stated they don’t want to be in Ukraine. But in that proposition they don’t lose Odessa and with it the Black Sea access, they don’t lose Kharkov, they stay as viable state instead of rump remains, they don’t have to denazify, they won’t have to change government, and the most importantly, killing stops now.

Yeah, no chance their handlers will allow them to agree.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Those are incredibly reasonable terms

permalink
report
reply

I haven’t kept up with shit in Ukraine well the past few months but this was my uneducated, gut reaction as well. Seems super reasonable.

Of course, they won’t be going for it since their donors won’t let them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Definitely a reasonable point to start negotiations. The Russians barely hold anything in Kherson, but you don’t start where you want. Otherwise, you don’t have any leeway in negotiations.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I was honestly surprised.

Ukraine will end up with worse terms though, since they will reject these.

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

Reddit is going to be insufferable about this isn’t it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s funny how it’s bad to give the Nazis Czechoslovakia, but it’s also bad not to give them the entirety of Poland.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

I’m not that up to date, so I would like to ask other people: why now? Has Russia decided that the war is too costly to be worthwhile continuing, or does Putin expect that he has demonstrated that Ukraine could never win a war against Russia? I know he’s proposed private peace deals, and I imagine they had similar terms.

Either way, I really doubt Zelesky will accept peace. This war has been way to beneficial for America. They’ve bought up public Ukranian assets, blown up the Nord Stream, made a shit load of money selling arms, cultivated massively successful propaganda, made Europe way more dependant on them, and so on. Zelesky would probably be being paid a visit from the men in black if he accepted this deal.

permalink
report
reply
53 points
*

They’ve probably been offering this deal privately for more than a year now. I guess at this point they feel it’s been long enough to demonstrate that Ukraine can’t kick them out even with NATO weapons. They’re making the offer public to put pressure on Zelenskyy and make him seem less reasonable with his completely unrealistic hard position of pre-2014 borders.

How well it will work I don’t know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

public proposal to cut through the narratives they’re spinning in Kiev, i imagine the expectation is that Ukrainians & especially conscripts will hear ‘lose the troublesome provinces for peace’ and rally to pressure the government. for Russia, a withdrawal of Ukraine’s troops will achieve what would probably take months in terms of territory, despite the ‘Ukraine is collapsing’ hype Russia hasn’t exactly been making rapid progress

permalink
report
parent
reply

my best guess would be that this weekend is the swiss peace summit where they invited like ninety countries but not russia. putting out the barest, most basic sounding demands is an easy play when you aren’t even invited to the current version of peace talks. it’ll make ukraine’s demands for crimea, belgorod, kaliningrad, and billion dollar annual reparations look ridiculous in a few days, if the talks even get that far. you’re right that the west isn’t done, but the west is the one cooking up this swiss conference

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points

lmao “peace talks” where one side isn’t invited

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Abraham accords II

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Wait Ukraine wants Kalingrad? Shouldn’t that exclave either stay with Russia or go to Poland?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I don’t think that comment was entirely serious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

The real reason is the west has given Russia every reason to believe they’re about to be hit with a nuclear bomb at any given moment. This isn’t really Russia changing their strategy or anything, I see this as more about Russia openly declaring they would rather have peace than nuclear war one last time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My uneducated guess? Putin has seen better polling then what’s made people public and figures that he better get going on a deal now because he doesn’t think the November elections are going to go his way.

permalink
report
parent
reply

news

!news@hexbear.net

Create post

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember… we’re all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

Community stats

  • 2.5K

    Monthly active users

  • 5.2K

    Posts

  • 150K

    Comments