You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
15 points

The Stone Henge people are saying that the water, lichen, and powder would have reacted badly. I do not have the education to know if that’s true or not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Strangley, 2 days ago they said they’ll have to get the experts out to have a look at it, before they can tell.

What a very quick turnaround that, apparently, was…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

They’re probably just a bunch of upset babies blowing everything out of proportion, of course they would go to the most unlikely and extreme outcome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Meh.

Their job is to defend stonehenge at all costs. They wouldn’t let people look at it if they could get away with it.

Of course they’re going to say that the powder is reckless and could potentially upset the lichen or something.

It’s hard to believe that this stunt could have any measurable impact in another 10 years or so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Nor did the protesters I would guess.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

Neither do the media outlets, but that’s the story their running with because the oil companies run ads on their networks.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

!climate@slrpnk.net

Create post

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Community stats

  • 4.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 6.8K

    Posts

  • 31K

    Comments

Community moderators