40 points
*

Fuck yeah

Do we have to call it an “artificial sun”? Because that’s… weirdly sinister. And “tokamak” or “plasma reactor” sound badass already.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Do we have to call it an “artificial sun”? Because that’s… weirdly sinister.

nah that sounds cool too

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Tokamak is a Soviet word

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

tokamak = hotboxing your car in the McDonald’s drive thru line

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

permalink
report
parent
reply

China is the dream; they’re like one of the few countries and only super power that’s actually working towards the betterment of humanity

permalink
report
reply
25 points

没有共产党,就没有新中国

permalink
report
parent
reply

Please translate!

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Without the Communist Party, there would have been no New China

permalink
report
parent
reply

This reminds me, the Korean version of this song goes so hard https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lD5pAHYEC6Q

permalink
report
parent
reply

hey i actually read this!

permalink
report
parent
reply

China: Trying to make the world a better place.

America: Trying to monetize the rot.

permalink
report
parent
reply

God China is winning so much right now

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Wow we need to nuke china RIGHT NOW and destroy this.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

The sinister chinese are causing global warming by creating a second sun, don’t they know it’s dang hot enough!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Technically they’re already nuking themselves by building this.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Artificial sin

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
24 points

I’d imagine, but I found this interesting:

Currently the maximum Q value achieved by humans is 1.53.

Had no idea someone had managed to get more energy out of a fusion device than they put in. Must have been unable to sustain it for any significant length of time, but still seems important.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It was big news I want to say about a year ago when a team first published that they had done it

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

The Q=1.53 was done at the National Ignition Facility using inertial confinement fusion, which is significant for plasma research (and probably bombs), but can’t be used to generate power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

It was the NIF two years ago but it’s also not going to be generating power ever, it was just a demonstration/proof of concept.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Also this is just plasma gain, not whole system gain. To have a commercially viable reactor your probably need Q total > 10 at least. No system build so far even has a Q total of 1

permalink
report
parent
reply

By 2027 the goal is Q>10

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

headlines that could be very different with a single letter change

permalink
report
reply
25 points

cummercial

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I was thinking “artificial son”

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points
*

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

American science just can’t compare

permalink
report
parent
reply

technology

!technology@hexbear.net

Create post

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

  • 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
  • 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
  • 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
  • 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
  • 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
  • 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
  • 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.

Community stats

  • 1.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.3K

    Posts

  • 17K

    Comments