3 points

Yeah and you push Clinton and look how 2016 ended up. And now we’re not just in hell, but living on the precipice of straight up fascism. Thanks guys.

permalink
report
reply
36 points

With Democrats like that who needs Republicans?

permalink
report
reply
-10 points

Somebody with a real dick for the dems to suck

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I can make farting noises with my armpits.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you think any one of them ain’t on the same team, you are a sucker. They may believe they are and think they’re telling the truth. Doesn’t matter. They’re capitalist. Every thing they do is theft from you and everyone else. Doesn’t matter. If you don’t think otherwise enough to at least figure out the truth, then you are as delirious as every one of them. It don’t matter. Result is always collective suicide irrespective of who does whatever they think they are doing or who wins that whack-a-troll.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

ah jacobin; the gateway pundit of the online left.

permalink
report
reply
5 points
*

Is RealClearPolitics unreliable too?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

i mean harold ford jr is a conservative fox news pundit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He’s a Democrat, of course he’s conservative. It doesn’t make his statement about helping Biden any less true.

Is Adam Smith a conservative news pundit too?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

We didn’t need them to admit it, and Bernie endorsed Biden just the other day. It wouldn’t surprise me if Biden were being pushed out the exact same way for being “too progressive.” The fact that the left wing of the DNC has been supporting him suggests this is the case.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

That’s odd because the only reason there’s leverage to remove Biden is because the party thought he wasn’t progressive enough in terms of Gaza.

Removing him because of his terrible debate is only politically feasible for Democrats because he has been losing in head-to-head polls since almost exactly October 7th.

I think AOC and Sanders are probably thinking of something else. My hunch, is they assume Republicans will challenge the existence of any Democrat on the ballot not named Joe Biden for some sort of rules violation, the decision will go to the Supreme Court, and the court will decide on returning 45 to the White House.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think they just know that they’re not the voices that could ever convince Joe Biden’s ego to stand down, and if he holds on they’d be the ones to suffer most for rebellion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I think the word you are looking for here is “cowards”

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Good going. Let’s argue and divide the Democrats when it needs unity the most.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

When OP is a closet Republican this is no surprise

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I wondered what was gonna replace “bot” as the go-to bogus accusation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

We held our noses and voted for him despite everything we knew in 2020. What did that get us? A genocide halfway across the world.

This time around I decided to believe Biden when he says he is a Zionist. He demonstrated it over 30,000 times so far.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I still remember on October 6th when Biden said “fuck all those Palestinians, murder them all.”

It wasn’t because of the actions of a terrorist group that sparked a disproportionate response at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

c/politics: your source for genocide apologia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Collective Punishment is a war crime and against international law. So was the blockade and occupation of Gaza and the West Bank. Palestinians aren’t resisting out of nothing and their resistance is legal per international law.

If this is the position most liberals hold, I see no reason why Arab and Muslim Americans should vote for a party that demonizes them anyways.

Now we don’t know if Biden ever said that about Palestinians on October 6th but he did say it about Lebanese in 1982. So I know that he at least believes it and his actions show it.

Begin said he was shocked at how passionately Biden supported Israel’s invasion when Biden “said he would go even further than Israel, adding that he’d forcefully fend off anyone who sought to invade his country, even if that meant killing women or children.” Begin said, “I disassociated myself from these remarks,” adding: “I said to him: No, sir; attention must be paid. According to our values, it is forbidden to hurt women and children, even in war. Sometimes there are casualties among the civilian population as well. But it is forbidden to aspire to this. This is a yardstick of human civilization, not to hurt civilians.” The comments were striking from Begin, who had been notorious as a leader of the Irgun, a militant group that carried out some of the worst acts of ethnic cleansing accompanying the creation of the state of Israel, including the 1948 Deir Yassin massacre.

https://theintercept.com/2021/04/27/biden-israeli-invasion-lebanon/

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If you don’t want evidence of fuckery coming out, it’s pretty easy not to engage in fuckery in the first place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

“Oh man this is very inconvenient to the echo chamber. Please move on everyone nothing to see here”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Go back to hexbear 🤣

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

“Sir I would like to inform you that different echo chambers such as hexbear exist where your comment would be well received”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

jacobin doesn’t want unity; jacobin wants to elect far right republicans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Reluctantly, I gave the piece a fair shake.

It’s garbage. We know that the DNC pushed other more moderate candidates out so that a more moderate candidate, one the average democratic voter and independent thinks they want, could win instead of them all splitting the vote. This was obvious, not some conspiracy theory.

The author of the piece is trying to claim that because one person said they chose a candidate that could beat sanders, that was the ultimate goal. But they wanted to beat sanders because they felt he couldn’t beat trump. They quote one person effectively saying this, but then dishonestly spin it.

The second quote is one person saying that he thinks sanders policies are bad, as if this proves anything.

It’s amazing anyone reads this site without realizing how terrible it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

For accelerationism, right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

also because most of the terminally online far left agree with the far right. which is why most of them are transphobic and anti-immigrant af.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 446K

    Comments