She’s already broken barriers, and now Kamala Harris could shatter several more after President Joe Biden abruptly ended his reelection bid and endorsed her.

Biden announced Sunday that he was stepping aside after a disastrous debate performance catalyzed fears that the 81-year-old was too frail for a second term.

Harris is the first woman, Black person or person of South Asian descent to serve as vice president. If she becomes the Democratic nominee and defeats Republican candidate Donald Trump in November, she would be the first woman to serve as president.

Biden said Sunday that choosing Harris as his running mate was “the best decision I’ve made” and endorsed her as his successor.

3 points

Does she support Netanyahu as unconditionally as Biden? I’ll vote for her anyway, but it would be nice if she actually took a stand against genocide. I’m probably asking too much, though.

permalink
report
reply
35 points

She’s a cop. ACAB. Didn’t like her when I voted for Biden the first time, don’t like her now.

But she isn’t Trump, and that’s enough for now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

And first Indian or non-white President as well. Don’t know why people have trouble saying that.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points
*

And first Indian or non-white President as well. Don’t know why people have trouble saying that.

If she was Indian she wouldn’t be eligible to be president; they did say “South Asian decent” though.

And are you saying Obama was white? I must be missing something here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points
*

There are TWO people in here not knowing something that should be known. What in the actual fuck.

Also, how old are you? I’d like to know so I can place my mental shame on whatever generation doesn’t know who is eligible to be president in the US. It makes me awfully sad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Dude, it’s a matter of linguistics and ethnic identity. Everyone here knows Obama has a white mother. You’re just being intentionally combative and taking advantage of the fact that most people - including Obama himself - identify him as black.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s obviously meant as indian-american.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

So some words we’re going to take strictly literally but some words were going to take with simple intention?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Why does Obama’s white mother determine how you refer to him instead of his black father, I wonder

permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

I wonder if you don’t understand the phrase “non-white”. Do you get that concept, or are you a glass half full kind of racist?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So to be extra simple about it, she’d be the first yellow-brown, where as Obama was white-brown.

In terms of american racism its just the brown part that matters, that makes them both “black” and there was even past comments about Harris not being “black enough” or something to that effect.

It makes more sense to call her the first Asian America that might be president if you want a “first” to claim.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Why doesn’t Obama’s blackness count? Does a little whiteness trump all his blackness for you?

Do you see how fucking stupid this is yet? Everyone understands what you’re saying. It’s just dumb as fuck. Obama identifies as black. The country sees him as black. Many black folk identify him as black. You calling him white is a self-report by you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

And first Indian or non-white President as well.

Bro…seriously?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

Bro…did you not know?

He doesn’t know everybody. Let’s let him figure this out on his own and see if his brain explodes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I suppose you’re saying that since Obama’s mother was white that makes him part-white, but that’s not really how race works in the US. Maybe it should be that way, maybe it shouldn’t, but right now it doesn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Obama was equal parts white and black

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

if she gets to the white house, I think it will be proudly said many, many more times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

This what i heard on the BBC.

edit: they said, “Indian-American”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Right? Not hearing this in the US.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

to be fair, i’m in the US. i heard it on the BBC Global News Podcast ;)

i like to hear global takes on our dumpster fire domestic events

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Its amazing how obsessed you guys are about race.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

A lot of us feel really bad about how we treat non-white races…

Granted, a lot of us feel really good about it too…

Either way, it weighs on us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Why dont you just treat everyone the same?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The American mind cant comprehend that sentence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s only been legally possible in the US in the last 60 years.

The scars are still visible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well according to you, the right wing already does this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sure, let’s start with the cops

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Trying to, but every time we do the right loses their damned minds.

I love how people like you take “It’s about damned time we have a woman (or black, circa 2008) president after centuries of not treating them equally” and somehow interpret that as “We’re trying to keep the white male down”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

This guy is a Trump supporter very thinly veiled as a leftist. Just thought folks on here might want to know. Scroll down just a bit and you’ll see the comment where they think that only Democrats are racist and the right treats everyone the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Leftists are absolute losers, I am not a leftist, and I am not a trump supporter, but I would vote for him over Kamala. Try again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why only black? She is half Indian. I don’t recall an Indian president?

Oh right nobody cares about other minorities, only kicking out Mexicans and propping up African Americans. Everyone else be damned.

Also why is the presidency limited to natural born citizens? Most of the world except the US, most of South America and a smattering of other countries require this. Shouldn’t everyone who has worked to gain citizenship be afforded the right to run for office? Doesn’t sound very free to me.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

I would argue it’s a security issue. I think it would be quite feasible for some foreign power to scoop up some 20 year old with nothing to lose and put them to the task of infiltrating America. In fact, stuff like that has already happened: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illegals_Program

Nowadays it’s much easier to influence the public by just bombarding them with bs social media posts. Watch the documentary “The Great Hack”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

So ~85 percent of the world is insecure because a naturalized citizen can run for office?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

All I’m saying is that it’s feasible, and very much in the interest of foreign powers to attempt to install people in positions of power. I think that’s a very cold take.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-48 points
*

Nah, she’s never been a contender. Unless the DNC rallies behind her and the rest of us agree, she will be a small blip on the radar as she was before being put into the VP spot

permalink
report
reply
6 points
*

Lol or not, so we forget 2016? Her whole campaign run?

For those who wish to re learn: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris_2020_presidential_campaign

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah that, or Donald fuckin trump?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What? Dude I’m voting for the D candidate no matter what. I’m just saying mrs Harris isn’t a strong candidate and has never been.

Fuck man lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yes? It was that forgettable

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Hopefully there is potency in someone who can speak full and coherant sentences! :-D You may be right but at the very least it’ll be nice to hear lucid speech again and we’ll soon see if it’s actually effective in the current climate! Wow the bar has been set low!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Well this is just a silly take. Have you not watched the state of the unions during bidens presidency? He was a decent politician. That includes speeches.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Oh he definitly WAS. Still can be on occasion. But the debate, trailing of into incoherance. Recent major gafs mixing up Putin and Zelensky and mixing up Trump and Kamala Harris?! His interview after the debate was better but not great and the harsh fact is that he’s as good as he will ever be right now and only going to get worse with time. As for the other person I was really mostly referring to, Trump has been a babbling, gush of incoherrancy for years!

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments