She’s already broken barriers, and now Kamala Harris could shatter several more after President Joe Biden abruptly ended his reelection bid and endorsed her.

Biden announced Sunday that he was stepping aside after a disastrous debate performance catalyzed fears that the 81-year-old was too frail for a second term.

Harris is the first woman, Black person or person of South Asian descent to serve as vice president. If she becomes the Democratic nominee and defeats Republican candidate Donald Trump in November, she would be the first woman to serve as president.

Biden said Sunday that choosing Harris as his running mate was “the best decision I’ve made” and endorsed her as his successor.

133 points

Nothing would irk Trump more than getting beat by a black woman.

permalink
report
reply
90 points

I don’t care if it pisses him off. I just want him to lose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I mean, it’s not the most important thing… But would it cause me joy? Yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Man. What a sweet thought. He’d probably have an aneurism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Its probably already on the way. Its just a hilarious reality plot already thickening

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Man now I want to vote Harris badly now! Obama wife would be a great VP really rub in watch Maga heads explode.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Michelle is a thoughtful and intelligent woman with some great experience, but I think she feels like she served her eight years, and has earned retirement (mostly) from politics. I tend to agree. That said, I’d be happy to vote for her in an election.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

She cant be VP, it’s tacky to nominate your VP to the Supreme Court. ;)

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Progressives should vote for her just to spite Hillary. Lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

He could drop out of the race now, so he can avoid that possibility.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

TBH statements like this are hurting her odds more than helping. Everybody on board already knows those things about her, nothing about her policies.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

American people are notoriously uninterested in policy when it comes to presidents in the general election. they elected W (with a minority) because they felt they could have a beer with him. they elected Obama for change, him being smart, a good orator, relatively young and black was a huge contrast to everything W was. they elected TFG (with a minority) because they thought he was an outsider. they elected Biden because he wasn’t TFG.

but yes they should promote Harris’ policies more because they aren’t bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

At least some of use do care. While I’m voting against Trump regardless, I’d rather vote for someone. If I do talk politics, I’d rather try to sell the benefits of a candidate, rather than what a disaster another candidate would be

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’ve always argued for that. like, usually if a party is running on being against someone or some group (this goes for parties demonizing gay people or immigrants or whatever minority as well) then i assume they’re not going to do anything for me, otherwise they’d be running on that.

unfortunately in two party systems it becomes one party running against a minority and the other party running on not being as bad as the first party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

TFG = That Fucking Git?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

yeah why not. it comes from “the former guy” but “that fucking git/goon/grifter…” works too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The Fat Guy

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

I think its less about changing the odds, and more about giving a needed morale boost to two minority groups long oppressed by politics in general.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You should probably be worried about our odds at this point in the game. We can celebrate her traits when she’s in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh I’ve stopped worrying about the odds, pretty sure we are permafucked. I’d like to be wrong and it’s not going to keep me me from voting blue down the panel.

Just that I know from my own experience cultural racism and misogyny is still a ridiculously powerful force, even among progressives.

And you are giving the public way too much credit. Almost no one really cares about accomplishments when it really boils down to it. It is all about how a person makes one feel, and that is largely informed by media that is notably NOT them enacting their policies.

Yes she has a good list of positive accomplishments, and has demonstrated her skill at statesmanship consistently to those who follow such things, but that isn’t your average voter. Or even your average swing voter.

There isn’t nearly as much cultural awareness of her as there is of a certain pants-shitting spraytanned twice impeached and 34 time felon, and people are gullible and easily swayed.

I want to be wrong because I in at least two groups of the people that cheetolini’s camp squads want to come after first, but I’ve already been acting on plans to get my family out of the country for the last 8 hours and I don’t plan on being on my home soil longer than it takes to vote in November and get on a plane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

People of colour and what’s the second? Women aren’t a minority if you meant that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

In politics they certainly are, and even when they reach high position they face greater hurdles and prejudices than their male counterparts. You don’t need to be tiny in number to be marginalized inhumanely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Honestly more amped up more than ever that there’s a nominee under 60. God bless Biden for everything. That old turd Trump should realize he’s too old and drop out too.

permalink
report
reply
-1 points
*

She’ll be 60 by the time of the election though.

edit: it’s not a bad thing, she’s still a lot younger than both Biden and Trump so it’s a huge step in the right direction, I’m just pointing out that she won’t be under specifically 60.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

👍

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Let’s maybe not focus solely on this, instead maybe on policy? Real problems Americans are facing every day is going to win more votes. Making the entire campaign about gender issues isn’t alone going to win shit.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Honestly, she has been shadowing an all-around decent president for the last 3ish years and like Obama, has the legal chops to back it up. Im not a fan of her stances from her DA days, but I dont think there is anyone else more qualified to do the job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Agreed, I believe she has a lot to offer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You can bet Republicans are gonna make her race and gender an issue though

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Well that’s their loser strategy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They already have, filling talks in all spaces with mysogyny and racism as soon as biden bowed out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

If elections were based on policy the GOP would have ceased to exist four days into Reagan’s presidency.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m happy for another chance at a Gen X president , not ready for a Millennial VP

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Isn’t she technically a very young boomer?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No, technically she is Generation Jones.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Jones

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not alone, but it will tick another box in voters’ minds

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Nope, gotta play demographic bingo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Will she earn votes? Gonna have to do some work.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Someone asked me what I thought about Biden dropping out. I said, it doesn’t matter. I am over policy, specifically NOT horrible policies like Project 2025.

So… like… what policies do you support?

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 449K

    Comments