Social media seems to be laughing its ass off about this tragedy, is it because the folks at burning man are perceived as frivolous hippies or something? Everyone I’ve ever met who was a regular burning man attendee has been a solid human being with strong morals, personally and financially responsible, a career. Upstanding members of society for sure. I guess all some people know is the sensationalized drugs and sex. A person died. This is a tragedy for an event that brings positivity into the world. Kind of annoyed.

248 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
193 points
*

It’s also because Burning Man, at least in the last decade or more, just turned into another affluent, rich white people and influencer event. Whatever it was to start, it’s effectively glamping now.

Sure, there are definitely some genuinely good people there, lower middle class, saved up and took their only vacation time they get all year to spend a few days there, and it sucks this happened to them. If those people end up in the hospital and the shitty insurance they get from work does fuck all to help mitigate the expenses, I’ll even get angry on their behalf.

But the majority of them? They spent a lot of money, money most people don’t have the luxury of getting to spend, on a pointless self-indulgent festival in the fucking desert, and this time it’s come back to bite them. My sympathy is extremely limited.

They’ll be miserable for a few days, get out, dry off, and go back to their easy lives. Their affairs are taken care of back home, they can miss days of work, their hospital stays will be covered, etc.

It’s kind of like the Fyre Festival. Those people got fucked over hard, but those people were also not the kind I particularly pitty. Spending a lot of money on an experience only to be miserable for a few days is not a tragedy. What happened to the poor people that lived there is the tragedy.

Edit: Also just want to point out OP is trying to call this a “tragedy” when there’s only been one suspected death, the cause of which is unknown as it hasn’t even been confirmed yet, but the overall mood is positive, and by all accounts everything is being managed. They’re trapped, not dying.

https://apnews.com/article/burning-man-festival-flooding-entrance-closed-d6cd88ee009c6e1f6d2d92739ec1ca18

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

It’s also because Burning Man, at least in the last decade or more, just turned into another affluent, rich white people and influencer event.

I’m pretty sure it’s been that way for at least 20 years…

The only people I’ve personally known to go to Burning Man was a rich kid in high school who went with his dad who was a marketing high-up at a very big tech company. Always came back talking about trying drugs and seeing some crazy shit, but then on Tuesday it’s right back to full days of pointless meetings I guess. I’ve never been and I frankly don’t ever care to, but that alone gave me the feeling that Burning Man is where tech suits go to play hippie for the weekend, and that always felt lame as fuck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points
*

I went a couple of times years ago when it was just starting to turn into what you describe. Had a great time, but it quickly priced me out. Now, it sounds like an influencer-laden hellscape. The addition of premium plug and play sites was the nail in the coffin. That said, a lot of the old time Burners are fucking amazing, creative, resourceful, and helpful people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

It’s kind of like the Fyre Festival. Those people got fucked over hard, but those people were also not the kind I particularly pitty. Spending a lot of money on an experience only to be miserable for a few days is not a tragedy.

Blame sensationalist media on this one, but it’s a misconception. Very few victims spent a lot of money on Fyre Festival. Most got tickets which were purported to be “all inclusive” for <$1500 USD (a pretty good deal, had it not been fraudulent). A handful of tickets sold for the $12K price which ended up in the headlines, but the standard price was a fraction of that. There’s a good summary of this discrepancy here: https://youtu.be/UBPg5ftCMv8

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

One of the things I’ve learned over time is people can have vastly different perceptions of what being “poor” is, and I suspect that’s what’s happening here.

I think there are those who could not afford to put down the 1.5k you’re quoting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

completely agree with this take, also OP screams american excepcionalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Wouldn’t every event or festival be an exercise in waste and excess? May be e we should just stay at home forever and work

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

I’ve heard smaller, local burns are better experiences now and are less wasteful. Just like most things, the original spirit and intent of an event gets lost when it becomes bigger and commercialized.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

Well it being in the middle of a desert makes it more wasteful.

But yes giant festivals that encourage a lot of travel and needlessly burning things are in general wasteful and potentially excessive. There are other leisure activities, so discouraging festivals is not equivalent to working nonstop.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Isn’t unnecessarily lighting stuff on fire kind of the point?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes.

People always judge personal waste as something they don’t enjoy. It’s fun to hate on people who enjoy things.

I have never went but the people I know who go have been going so long that their kids are bringing their kids. It sounds like a great community event where most of the point is to meet the people who go there.

The desert is usually a good place to host a mass event since it is a flat large area. By definition rain is rare in a desert.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

small local burns are more true to form in that endeavor. people clean up after themselves and are generally respectful.

some bad actors, but it’s a nice disconnect from technology.

I like to go and host a alternate dimension themed arcade with silly obscure games.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ive heard of this lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Alchemy in Wakanda

haha come on. what are you talking about?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Ooh, what games? Where?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

local burns, whatever seems whimsical and trippy

permalink
report
parent
reply
-32 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
170 points

Burning Man ‘promotes’ anti-consumerism and communal effort, however attending requires significant financial resources and costs that can and do exclude (most) people, it’s living hyprocracy, and an excellent example of capitalism corrupting grass roots ideals. honestly is an absolute joke of a festival.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

There is a similar thing not far from where I live. Through an unlucky friend, then the neighbour of their festival grounds, I got to discover the organizers’ ‘ideals’ and ‘ethical and ecological approach’ first hand. In short: it was about money. And more money. And they managed to turn a large reservoir into a dying punch bowl of acid, piss and shit within only a decade. I suspect Burning Man to be the same, considering the ticket prices. The fact that some poor fools with their heart and soul intact save their little money to visit this monstrosity just makes it more sad.

I don’t actively engage in Schadenfreude much, but I do carry a little of it in my heart. If people think flying or driving very far away for Entertainment, and bringing thousands of people into an otherwise quiet place is okay for the wildlife there, and can be in any way an ecological thing, they have understood very little about ecology. And now also ignored by most: the destruction that happens by the thousands of ‘poor humans who just wanted to have fun’ trampling through the last remnants of life in a drought stricken place.

We are not alone on this planet. Invading a place with our idea of fun is very damaging. We can party perfectly well at home. If home happens to be bleak and sad maybe we should work on that first before invading quiet places.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Just as a counterpoint, the area burning man is held in is one of the most ecologically inert places you could go. There’s no vegetation and the only life to speak of is brine shrimp eggs, which are about as threatened as mosquito larvae.

There’s still a lot of trash that gets left behind which can travel with wind, but as far as impact on the land goes, it’s likely significantly less invasive than your local county fair. There’s just nothing out there for them to damage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

No it doesn’t. Poor as dirt and go almost every year. So many idiots in this thread have no idea what they’re talking about. Just parroting the media.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

And yet you spend like Bilbo Baggins?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

What if I told you you could be less poor than dirt if you didn’t buy overpriced festival tickets?

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Clearly, people who classify themselves as “poor as dirt” should not be allowed to spend money on anything they consider fun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

the people I knew who went in the past would usually pool money together in order to get all the camping supplies and gas money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s like $400 for a ticket, and then the rest of the cost is getting there, food, water, shelter, etc. You can pay as little or as much as you want to accomplish those things. Plenty of people drive there and stayed in tents. I don’t see how it’s any different than camping for a few days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

Because I can go camp somewhere for less than $100?

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Lmao I’ve camped for free just by pitching a tent off the side of a secluded road.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

You wouldn’t be at burning man then. It’s obviously a very different experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

check again it was up to $575 this year

Ive never been to burning man. I went to Coachella a LLOOONNGG time ago when it was hippies rolling around in the dust. Coachella ain’t that anymore, it’s instagram rich kids and tech bros. I assume the same thing has happened to burning man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
169 points

Some of the worst people I’ve worked with are “burners”.

There’s apparently a private jet at burning man this year that was taking off and landing constantly so that people could fuck on the jet - it’s fall of Rome style excess in a broken world where most people’s basic needs are not met on an enormous scale.

Your statement is fairly tone deaf to the basic objective reality of the “party”, OP. The frustrated people at the bottom are feeling a bit of catharsis in the money burning factory closing for a day while they starve and watch.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

So like “let’s fly on private jets to a nice swiss resort to discuss climate change”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-78 points

So you think it’s okay to laugh at people dying?

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Burners by and large are dipshits, but no one reasonable is laughing at anyone dying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Hot take: fundamentally, yes. The simple fact that people are dying does not render something unfunny.

That said, no one has died yet (well, one person, but that was ruled unrelated to the flooding).

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The fact only one person has died speaks pretty well of their community, actually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Did you miss all the memes about the billionaire dying in the submarine a couple months back? People like laughing at dark humor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Generally no, but this episode of tough hippie mudder has been great.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

Way to confirm you’re actually as bad or worse than any of them morally. 👍

permalink
report
parent
reply

If someone falls asleep inside the giant puppet and they burn him alive with everyone gathered around, I’m sorry but that’s just very funny. Dark, but funny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Why wouldn’t it be?

permalink
report
parent
reply
145 points

aside from the obvious “rich people exploiting the environment with their hippy party that costs $200 for their cheapest tickets,” I saw a video online that brought up a good point that I never considered. The cost of lumber has increased exponentially in the past 3 years alone, jumping to nearly $1700 per 1000 feet at its peak in 2021, but staying between $400 and $600 per 1000 feet in recent months (still high compared to say 10 years ago.) And these people are buying tens of thousands of feet of lumber solely to burn it away in the middle of nowhere where there’s little vegetation to absorb the excess CO2 waste. That, along with the climate change protesters being police brutalized just before the event, really puts a sour taste in people’s mouths. Especially in a time where “once in a lifetime” weather events seem to be back-to-back.

economic data from: https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/lumber

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Tickets cost about 10x that. I was interested back when it was a cool art exchange, freedom event. But SO many people flock to it as a giant party that it’s become restrictive unless your volunteering or bringing an exhibit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

From old burners I have talked to, the entire experience has completely changed. Alcohol used to be frowned upon, now it’s common place.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Sincerely with rocket launches now being a daily thing i’m not very worried by that burning lumber.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Rockets mostly use hydrogen as fuel, burning wood is way more polluting than burning hydrogren.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Also John Wilson tried to go shoot at the event and after compiling hours of footage was told that he couldn’t use any of it because there was some exclusive licensed coverage provider for the event.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

And these people are buying tens of thousands of feet of lumber solely to burn it away in the middle of nowhere where there’s little vegetation to absorb the excess CO2 waste.

That’s not really how plants work.

Photosynthesis turns co2 + water into sugar + oxygen. Cellular respiration turns sugar + oxygen into co2 + water.

The total co2 absorbed by a plant is exactly equal to the amount of co2 used to make all the sugar, cellulose, etc. the plant currently has. Digestion, decomposition, fires etc. undo that.

A mature forest or lawn is carbon neutral: new growth is balanced out by decomposition of old growth.

Distance to plants doesn’t matter. What matters is if and how the trees they’re burning are being replanted or replaced. .

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thanks for the correction. That helps me better understand how counteracting pollution works

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yesterday in the US it was labour day, 100 of millions of Americans has a BBQ many using coal and wood the impact of burning man is insignificant in comparison

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

Burning wood just releases the co2 absorbed when growing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

What are fossil fuels other than captured carbon from plants and animals from long ago?

Rereleasing carbon is the problem now. Wood being sustainable needs a non-surplus in carbon emissions to begin with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Everything is “carbon neutral” on a long enough timescale. One of many reasons why that expression is 100% unadulterated bollocks. If you’re an airline, you can’t just offset the damage you do by paying a Bangladeshi farmer two dollars to throw some tree seeds on the ground.

permalink
report
parent
reply
119 points

Burning Man may be the epitome of the many optimistic and maybe naive qualities of the 90s that were co-opted and exploited in the early 2000s, and turned into the very things they were built to protest against - another being the free and open internet

permalink
report
reply
19 points

Yes. I watched it happen. The large number of people that go now pay thousands $$ for a plug-n-play camp and don’t contribute their own art (if they even have art). They are not what the festival once stood for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

Hot take

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You know what isnt a hot take? Think how much pollution the event generated, how much greenhouse gases.

Seems worth it for a party lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ha. When I said hot take I meant that you were dead-on with that take. But I’m downvoted all over this thread for suggestion nuance and compassion…so fuck hipsters they deserve it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

No Stupid Questions

!nostupidquestions@lemmy.world

Create post

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others’ questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That’s it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it’s in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.

Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

Community stats

  • 9.7K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.7K

    Posts

  • 107K

    Comments