In her first campaign rally as the presumptive Democratic nominee to face Donald Trump, Vice President Kamala Harris took aim at her Republican rival and a widely derided Trump-linked platform that provides a blueprint for the next GOP administration.

“Donald Trump wants to take our country backward,” she said in remarks from Milwaukee on Tuesday, just two days after President Joe Biden ended his re-election campaign and endorsed his vice president.

Harris, who secured enough delegate pledges to clinch the Democratic Party’s nomination within a little over 24 hours after announcing her candidacy, linked Trump to Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation-backed plan for his administration, and one that his campaign is now furiously trying to distance itself from.

“He and his extreme Project 2025 agenda will weaken the middle class. We know we got to take that seriously,” Harris said. ”Can you believe they put that thing in writing? Read it. It’s 900 pages.”

The plan proposes cuts to Social Security and Medicare, tax breaks to corporations that will force “working families to foot the bill” and abolishes the Affordable Care Act, which “will take us back to a time when insurance companies had the power to deny people with preexisting conditions,” Harris said.

163 points

Did Biden ever even really talk about 2025? I’m loving that this is one of the very first places she goes and I hope she just presses hard on it non-fucking stop what’s in it

permalink
report
reply
110 points
*

Tell them their porn’s going away. Do it in the fucking debate. Do it pussy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Unfortunately a large number of conservatives support that. Like how Mike Johnson has an app that tells his son whenever he’s jacking off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

How is that app supposed to work?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

TIL. This is weird as fuck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

No ballsmala?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

you could probably use vpn or whatever to get around that. i think it’s worse that they want to incriminate sex workers

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’ll go back to their couches.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Biden was too soft to mention it… Good thing he’s out of the race

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points
*

the heritage foundation has been putting out a project 2025 like document since 1980 and nearly 75% of all of the recommendations have been enacted by both democrats and republicans since then, including biden.

biden didn’t talk much about project 2025 because, if you looked into it, you’ll find that biden was a big proponent of the 1980’s & 1990’s versions of the project 2025; so it was politically advantageous that he pretended that it never happened and he never did it to ensure a distinction between him and maga stayed present in today’s political discourse. the same is true with gay marriage; lgbtq in federal service; student loans; segregation; feminism; etc. and i bet that’s why he dropped out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I would just like to point out that this is an example of the tried-and-true rhetorical technique of shrugging off issues with a dismissive “that’s not new.” We see politicians and spokespersons do it all the time, because, maddeningly, it works.

But, it doesn’t actually matter whether it’s new, does it? Couple things: The Heritage Foundation has put out a similar document every election cycle for decades, but the contents have changed; this iteration could be (is!) much, much worse. Even if Heritage had been putting out the same plan all along, and we didn’t object then, well, we can still object now. We don’t have to keep making the same mistakes in the future just because we made them in the past.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s almost as if career politicians aren’t great choices cause of all the baggage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
142 points

I’m legitimately curious how many people have actually read their document. I just started the other day and I’m about 100 pages in. I’m glad to see people are starting to realize the amount of coordination going on within the far right. Straight up playbook for stacking the cards and consolidating power to the executive branch. Borderline unconstitutional type stuff.

permalink
report
reply
45 points

I’m confused… They did it on cameras on Jan 6th… why are some Americans still blind to it. Do they know they can listen to the trump tapes!?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

They either don’t care or ignore it. As long as their side is on top they shrug it off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

But it’s not… Republican side isn’t anyway.

The only ‘side,’ that wins out of ignoring Jan 6th is people who genuinely want trump to be king.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No you see, that was their crazies, and even though they support their crazies, you shouldn’t do guilty by association.

Having said that, I’ve been going on far right forums and it’s mostly guilty by association. They find a very obviously wrong “leftist” and claim that anyone that calls themselves a leftist has the responsibility to keep all those wearing the label in check.

Their logic doesn’t even work cause, I could just use another label, doubt they would allow me to self identify though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I read some but I had to stop after it started talking about the deep state, when that’s the whole point of p2025. A right wing deep state. The 180 proof, acidic nature of the irony melted my face and I could no longer see.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

These motherfuckers are always doing what they accuse the other side of doing

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

They’re well past “borderline” unconstitutional.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Our supreme court agrees with them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But the constitution doesn’t

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

the heritage foundation has been putting out a project 2025 like document since the 1980 and both republicans and democrats (biden included) have enacted around 75% of the recommendations so far; conservatives continuing this tradition is status quo for the united states.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Heritage foundation is an israeli lobby which explains why both Democrats and Republicans participate.

Just check out their amazing headlines

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Do you have a link handy for further reading on this? I knew the heritage foundation has been terrible since inception but I didn’t realize how much sway they’ve had historically. I thought that influence was new

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
-1 points

I used ChatGPT to skim for relevant elements as I fact check it for content.

permalink
report
parent
reply
134 points

Trump put his criminal conspiracy to pay off Stormy Daniels in writing.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/09/politics/hush-money-trial-evidence-trump-charges-dg/index.html

[nsfw] https://youtu.be/pBdGOrcUEg8

permalink
report
reply
55 points
*

And yet multiple people have seen him eating pieces of paper. I’m starting to think he just likes eating paper.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

According to one source.

https://www.businessinsider.com/omarosa-saw-trump-eating-paper-in-oval-office-2018-8

Denied by someone who knows him better. https://www.newsweek.com/trump-not-eating-paper-cohen-omarosa-1070371

But here’s some paper related news you might enjoy

https://youtu.be/GbvF2knVsEU

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Remember when he kept complaining about the low flow toilets in the white house? I think he was tired of all the clogs caused by flushing documents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s high in fiber

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

What happens when you try to be a criminal without having Stringer Bell by your side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
110 points
*

So now that Project 2025 is unpopular and Trump is trying to distance himself from it, has anyone else found Trump’s lack of campaign promises kind of strange? Leading up to the 2016 election he made a ridiculous amount of promises. Mexico building a wall, bring back coal, lock up Hillary, repeal and replace Obamacare, balanced budget. This time around it’s very different. I can’t think of any promises he’s made. Could it be he doesn’t want to mention the promises he failed to delivered on or maybe Project 2025 is exactly what he has in mind?

permalink
report
reply
40 points

I’m starting to think that he doesn’t care whether he wins or loses. He has a horde of sycophants following him that he can continue grifting off of from now until the end of his days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

I think he cares more about humiliation than almost anything else, and he sees winning as the only way to avoid not only the humiliation of losing the election but also the humiliation of facing any consequences at all for his many crimes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

I’m sure he cares. If he wins he can make many of his problems go away. On the other hand win or lose he can share his stake in DJT and be a billionaire. Doing so would screw over a lot of people so I doubt he will do that if he wins.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

Yep close to 40% of the country will turn out and vote for him. He could be pulling wads of poo out of his diaper and flinging them at the audience during his rallies and this wouldn’t change. They’re rooting for their team good season or bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Yep close to 40% of the country will turn out and vote for him.

This idea right here needs to actually die for the sake of democracy.

No…close to 40% of the country will not turn out to vote for him. Close to 40% of people WHO VOTE will turn out to vote for him.

just under 155 million Americans voted in 2020 (out of a population of just over 331 million) which makes a voter turnout of 46%.

46% of the country (conservative and liberal) don’t vote because they just don’t care. Neither side truly represents them and, whether they consider themselves conservatives or liberals, they’re just folks who want to live their lives and let other people live theirs; what I call the “Your fist my nose” voting bloc; people who believe (regardless of their own leanings) that “your right to swing your fist ends where my nose begins”.

more than half of America doesn’t vote. If they live a conservative lifestyle and they don’t vote…they’re NOT a Republican. If they have a liberal mindset and they don’t vote, they’re NOT a Democrat. That’s literally the definition of Republican and Democrat.

But instead of actually talking to those 46% of people people, everyone just pretends that every Conservative is just as bad as a Republican and every Liberal is just as bad as a Democrat and therefore there’s no point in conversing.

It’s absolutist shit like that that keeps the status quo in effect and prevents any meaningful change.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I think when people are in that little private booth, there will be more republicans that vote for Kamala. The only thing they have to run on anymore is immigration, but thats not working as well as everyone thinks, IMO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

It doesn’t matter. His voters believe that he’s the guy that somehow kept all the promises he made.
Reality doesn’t really matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I like to assume it’s related to all the lead released into the environment. The populations IQ went down 5 to 10 points due to lead poisoning from leaded gasoline in the 20th century so someone could turn a fat profit at the cost of humanity’s cognitivity. Critical thinking is harder than it used to be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

His campaign promise is to turn America into a dictatorship. He doesn’t need the heritage foundation or anyone else’s input on that.

His voters want it SO bad. Totalitarianism comes from this exact social situation over and over in history.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

Can you believe they put that thing in writing?

Absolutely.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Acting openly horrible has been hugely successful with their base. Maybe it’s gone far enough that all the low information voters out there will start seeing how crazy things have gotten. I know the women in my social circle are pissed, and they’re pretty much all white suburban moms. That’s a group that could have a big effect here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I know the women in my social circle are pissed

I’m curious. About what specifically? That “MAGA Manifesto” is huge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I haven’t exactly interrogated them about all the details, but there is a lot of anger about all the stuff specific to women for sure. I think the Roe overturning primed many women (and people in general) to see that this shit is serious and not just the empty political talk they’re used to mostly ignoring. They are worried it will continue to get worse and make their health care more difficult in general, not just for abortions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Somewhere there is a site that lets you put in topics that concern you, and it pulls up page numbers and quotes from p2025 that fit. I really need to find and bookmark it for linking…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points
*

I’ve read 103 pages so far… Nothing worth noting as extreme in this document. The left (not everyone) is just fkin stupid, ignorant, and parroting chit. No different than calling Trump Hitler, a dictator, a Nazi, a racist, a fascist etc…

I get the tactic though.

It’s election year. They needed to fear monger, so they chose “Project 2025”. They needed to race bait, so they needed to find a story anywhere in America about a White cop shooting a non-violent Black person - Sonya Massey. BLM isn’t falling for their chit. They’ve caught on.

Leftist tactics are played out, same ol fkin moves as before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Nazis always seem to be stupid enough to leave evidence around of their plans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Where do you think the villain monologue trope comes from? lol

permalink
report
parent
reply

I mean they do seem like a Saturday morning cartoon villain just monologuing their evil plan because they think they have the hero down for the count.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Worse, they think they are the heroes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m surprised they’re not trying to sell it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They haven’t figured out a way to fit the whole thing on a shoe.

Just you wait.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The heritage foundation LOVES smelling their own farts.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments