In her first campaign rally as the presumptive Democratic nominee to face Donald Trump, Vice President Kamala Harris took aim at her Republican rival and a widely derided Trump-linked platform that provides a blueprint for the next GOP administration.

“Donald Trump wants to take our country backward,” she said in remarks from Milwaukee on Tuesday, just two days after President Joe Biden ended his re-election campaign and endorsed his vice president.

Harris, who secured enough delegate pledges to clinch the Democratic Party’s nomination within a little over 24 hours after announcing her candidacy, linked Trump to Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation-backed plan for his administration, and one that his campaign is now furiously trying to distance itself from.

“He and his extreme Project 2025 agenda will weaken the middle class. We know we got to take that seriously,” Harris said. ”Can you believe they put that thing in writing? Read it. It’s 900 pages.”

The plan proposes cuts to Social Security and Medicare, tax breaks to corporations that will force “working families to foot the bill” and abolishes the Affordable Care Act, which “will take us back to a time when insurance companies had the power to deny people with preexisting conditions,” Harris said.

30 points

“Project 2025 will weaken the middle class.”

Project 2025 will destroy the middle class. It is a guide to creating a Judge Dredd universe where the only people living in it will be the Super Rich and Super F*cking Poor. They’re not even trying to hide it.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

And the Judges are theofascists. Imagine Judge Dredd showing up and going, “You dishonored your mother and father by being gay. Punishment for that offense is death.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-81 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
1 point

I bet you know a lot/lust after warm water ports eh?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Here’s something Lemmy doesn’t have, why is this the second highest parent comment? Reddit would have buried it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Renoved, see the new civility rule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Renoved, see the new civility rule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Renoved, see the new civility rule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I don’t understand how pointing out that an account that is obviously a troll breaks this rule. If that breaks the rule and gets removed it will foster more disinformation on this site, which is problematic. We can’t allow fresh accounts to spread baseless information and moderate those who call it out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I’ve got a little while until I do my psychiatry clinical rotation in school, but I feel like interviewing you to hear about your theories and perceptions would make for a fascinating case report.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

What I don’t understand is how their first two sentences completely contradict the last sentence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’ve worked in ERs before and dealt with a lot of mental health patients in crisis. I’ve met some schizophrenics that have been off their meds and on street drugs for months in the middle of a complete psychotic break that still have a better grasp on reality than some of these folks.

(To be clear, they were in that situation because they lost their job, home, and health insurance, so they had no way to access the medication that had kept them stable previously, and the street drugs were an attempt at self-medication.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

I don’t like her, but you have to admit that’s hysterical.

permalink
report
reply
36 points
*

As I said, Trump is totally ignorant of the Streishand Effect here. Which he used to tremendous effect before.

AND of his own strategy of “mention you don’t support something, repeatedly, as a sign you low key support it.”

Now he’s actually trying to say he doesn’t support something, and it’s like he’s totally forgotten his own history.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

I’m just gonna leave this here. It’s the low key support strategy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Saved

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Everyone knows he lies like most people breath anyways. His only position is whatever gets people to cheer and clap for him so he gets his narcissistic fix, or the last person to talk to him that stroked his ego the right way. The people who will actually to do stuff in his administration definitely want 2025, and that’s what matters. I’m only a neighbor of the US but a country that implements 2025 is a scary one to be next to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points

Can you believe they put that thing in writing?

Absolutely.

permalink
report
reply
22 points

Nazis always seem to be stupid enough to leave evidence around of their plans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Where do you think the villain monologue trope comes from? lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I’m surprised they’re not trying to sell it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They haven’t figured out a way to fit the whole thing on a shoe.

Just you wait.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The heritage foundation LOVES smelling their own farts.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I mean they do seem like a Saturday morning cartoon villain just monologuing their evil plan because they think they have the hero down for the count.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Worse, they think they are the heroes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Acting openly horrible has been hugely successful with their base. Maybe it’s gone far enough that all the low information voters out there will start seeing how crazy things have gotten. I know the women in my social circle are pissed, and they’re pretty much all white suburban moms. That’s a group that could have a big effect here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I know the women in my social circle are pissed

I’m curious. About what specifically? That “MAGA Manifesto” is huge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points
*

I’ve read 103 pages so far… Nothing worth noting as extreme in this document. The left (not everyone) is just fkin stupid, ignorant, and parroting chit. No different than calling Trump Hitler, a dictator, a Nazi, a racist, a fascist etc…

I get the tactic though.

It’s election year. They needed to fear monger, so they chose “Project 2025”. They needed to race bait, so they needed to find a story anywhere in America about a White cop shooting a non-violent Black person - Sonya Massey. BLM isn’t falling for their chit. They’ve caught on.

Leftist tactics are played out, same ol fkin moves as before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Somewhere there is a site that lets you put in topics that concern you, and it pulls up page numbers and quotes from p2025 that fit. I really need to find and bookmark it for linking…

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

I haven’t exactly interrogated them about all the details, but there is a lot of anger about all the stuff specific to women for sure. I think the Roe overturning primed many women (and people in general) to see that this shit is serious and not just the empty political talk they’re used to mostly ignoring. They are worried it will continue to get worse and make their health care more difficult in general, not just for abortions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 502K

    Comments