20 points

At least she didn’t jump out of the window 🌝

permalink
report
reply
36 points

Similar thing happened across the border, in Ukraine, with a pacifist being accused of “justifying the war”, as reported by Democracy Now!

permalink
report
reply
35 points
*

Russian pacifists want Russia to stop invading Ukraine.

Lemmygrad / Hexbear pacifists want Ukraine to appease Russia and give up territory.

They are not the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Adding “jailing pacifists for speaking out” to the things dronies openly support, along with forcing others to fight when they’re not willing to, poisoning civilians with generations of birth defects, and giving cluster bombs to Nazis.

The moral high ground, ladies and gents

permalink
report
parent
reply

No, we want Ukraine to stop trying to ethnically cleanse the Donbas and give the people there self determination. And we want the Ukrainian government to stop forcibly conscripting people to go die needlessly on the front in a clearly losing war. We want NATO to stop enabling all of that (it literally wouldn’t be happening if they weren’t demanding that it continue). That’s what it is to be a peace activist. And I’m fairly sure I can speak for all of us, we are not pacifists, lol. But we are advocates for peace and the end to the horrible and needless loss of life.

Nice try to completely twist reality, and completely misrepresent us, as you war mongering dronies always do.

Edit: We actually give a shit about all the Ukrainian people being thrown into a fucking meat grinder. We care about their lives. The people who just say “more weapons to Ukraine!” do not give a shit about the lives of the people there. They’re happy to just let the war keep dragging on until the last capable Ukrainian is dead. An example of how WE feel about the tragedy of the situation: https://hexbear.net/post/503747 (hexbear link to a lemmygrad news post)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Edit: We actually give a shit about all the Ukrainian people being thrown into a fucking meat grinder. We care about their lives. The people who just say “more weapons to Ukraine!” do not give a shit about the lives of the people there. They’re happy to just let the war keep dragging on until the last capable Ukrainian is dead. An example of how WE feel about the tragedy of the situation: https://hexbear.net/post/503747 (hexbear link to a lemmygrad news post)

So be fucking outraged then that Russia started, and is continuing this war. They’re the ones killing Ukrainians in their homeland.

A comment from that link:

Omg, it’s a full on genocide of Ukrainian people. Just damm the Western libs… Fuck this planet.

Russia is committing genocide. They’ve been raping and killing civilians since the start, this is where your anger and energy needs to be. Imagine being outraged at the nation defending itself from genocide, and those countries that are sending the tools that they’re being asked for to help defend themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Russian pacifists want Russia to stop invading Ukraine.

Western “pacifists” want to send NATO tanks to Ukraine.

They are not the same.

Russian anti-war activists have a correct position.

But an important consideration should be whether one’s actions actually contribute to Russia withdrawing sooner, or if they instead help justify further, equally self-interested NATO involvement in the war.

Unless you are Russian, it’s most likely the latter.

There are two imperialist blocs involved in the conflict, and it doesn’t matter which one of them technically started it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points
*

There are two imperialist blocs involved in the conflict, and it doesn’t matter which one of them technically started it.

I’m sorry, but when it involves one imperialist bloc invading a smaller country, then it does matter.

Do you have the same position regarding the Vietnam war, Palestine, Iraq, and Afghanistan? Or do you only support whichever side is not aligned with the US?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Whataboutism and false equivalency. Nice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thought terminating cliches. Nice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
*

Logical fallacies. Try having logical thoughts and people won’t throw these at you :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
21 points

The problem with the RFA source is the CIA funding, not that it’s in English. It’s pretty disingenuous to try to imply Newizu is pro-Putin or anti-imperialist, or anti-west or anything else that would qualify as a separate bias or agenda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

I don’t think they’re implying anything like that? A Russian source talking about a bad thing Russia did is generally more reliable than a CIA source saying the same thing, since there’s less incentive to make stuff up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

I read the previous comment. I tried to find a source they would prefer.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Thank you

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Compared to Russian sources radio free liberty is a baron of truth and press accountability, so frankly it does not matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

A shitty source not being the absolute worst source doesn’t make it any less shitty than it is. If your only options for news are US government propaganda or Russian government propaganda, the only valid choice is to stop following the news.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

It literally isn’t. RFE is definitely a US propaganda platform, but it objectively has nothing to do with the CIA these days. But you should probably check under your bed one more time just to make sure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points
*

RFE also “objectively” had nothing to do with the CIA for nearly 20 years after it was created, at which point it turned out the CIA had been funding it all along. But now we know they’ve stopped because they said they did, and anyone suggesting that they’re not editorially independent is a paranoid loon, just as they would’ve been in the 50’s and 60’s.

Some of us don’t believe that the people whose job it is to lie stopped lying because they said they did. Suggesting that the CIA is still doing things that they did regularly and successfully kept hidden in the past is not a conspiracy theory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points
*

Preach! 🙌

permalink
report
parent
reply

RFE is definitely a US propaganda platform, but™️

That’s all you need to know. Scrap the whole source.

permalink
report
parent
reply

IDK it might be beneficial to know if it’s ANOTHER one of the 15 intelligence agencies the US operates…

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

The CIA routinely funds groups covertly. As is the case with RFE, we are often able to confirm this covert funding decades later.

A main purpose of the CIA is to obscure what groups the U.S. supports. Did they just stop doing their job one day?

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points
*

Why? What possible reason could you have to belive they just turned over a new leaf?

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

“The CIA said that they don’t have anything to do with Radio Free anymore so it must be true.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

sourced directly from the fertile fields of your ass

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I searched for her name and despite the RFE article being a week old, no other more credible outlets have picked up on it. Maybe other outlets are using a different romanization of her name but this is certainly a red flag.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-33 points

How many years did donkey get? Did she at least get her swamp back?

permalink
report
reply
45 points
*

Here’s a map of the global freedom status, and Russia seems to be in the same group with most of Africa Middle East and Asia. Considering this context, the news article doesn’t seem surprising at all. Just another sad day in Russia.

permalink
report
reply
-19 points

So is Turkey, your NATO ally who bombs minorities and steals other peoples cultural heritage. Stop being a hypocrite

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Yes Turkey is a controversial country to most of us in NATO. Terrible example.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Turkey is a genocidal horde. Russia one could call controversial before 2022, now it’s just miserable and on its way to becoming a trainwreck.

EDIT: What I meant - it’s a good example, if you just call that “controversial” and not a problem to be solved now, while Russia somehow is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think you can join the Russian army if you really like the war crines of Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

Go and be a landmine exploder for Ukraine if you love freedom so much.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Big words from someone who just brought three different forms of sharia law into BRICS.

I still don’t fucking understand why tankies simp so hard for this shit. It’s like you are trying to prove that your philosophy is no deeper than “America bad.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Unfortunately NATO wasn’t designed in a way that conceived of a rogue member state like Turkey. This means that it has a very limited toolkit for reigning in Erdogan’s excesses. He also has a huge amount of leverage due to Turkey’s pivotal role on the Black Sea which is obviously critical to everything happening in Ukraine. For now, NATO really does have its hands tied with regard to Turkey.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

No, it doesn’t really, they just don’t want to do anything. Everything happening in Ukraine started happening much later than Turkey happened.

And about NATO design not conceiving of something - when Turkey was admitted to NATO, there were people still alive who saw not their parents and grandparents, but their children and grandchildren killed before their eyes in 1915-1921.

It was conceived that if somebody really wanted to get rid of that thing, then it’d be possible to make a shortcut on paperwork with all the military power. 1952, remember. But then again, it was 1952, you know, colonial powers still being that and not caring much about genocides of brown people. So nobody would see Turkey’s current behavior as a problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The best and last argument of dumb tankies is whataboutism. Thank you for your insightful contribution.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

I don’t think it’s whataboutism to point out that a worse criminal you are fine with, and a smaller one not, because the latter kills “blue-eyed Europeans” and all that.

You can’t just discard observations that you are a hypocritical bag of piss with that one word, “whataboutism”. And it only refers to somebody defending their own crimes. Most of real whataboutism I see in social media comes from Turks and Westerners defending Turks.

Other than that, if somebody says that and you don’t, I don’t care if they’re a tankie. Turkey is worse than a Stalinist dictatorship, and I have priorities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Stop supporting nazis.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

The makers of this map, Freedom House, receive funding mainly from the US government. They also took money from BAE Systems, Britain’s biggest arms manufacturer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

And your point would be…

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The argument would be that their findings are therefore somehow tainted and unreliable. However, without any evidence that this is so, simply pointing it out as if it’s some kind of “gotcha” is in fact fallacious, as you suggest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Yeah, well it might not be the best source, but at least they have a map that measures something interesting. The second best option would have been the map of press freedom index. It’s not quite the same things and it isn’t entirely relevant to the conversation either, but there you go. At least it tells you something about the attitude different countries have towards the media, which may or may not be associated with the attitude towards activists. This map also paints a slightly more nuanced picture, but the conclusion is largely the same as before.

See also: Wikipedia

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Ukraine’s being yellow is just wrong. It doesn’t really matter if it’s fair, but with the ongoing war and the effects of it on the society and its attitudes towards press the color should be orange.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well, there’s less bias typical for UK-funded sources than usual. At least Azerbaijan is not the same color as Armenia (thought the UK seem to have made a 180-degree turn on that conflict in the last couple of weeks, while keeping the same “formal”"legal" position).

Ah, that’s OT, about Russia - it would be purple on that map even before 2008.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

…and Russia seems to be in the same group with most of Africa Middle East and Asia. Considering this context, the news article doesn’t seem surprising at all. Just another sad day in American brain dead news for morons.

Honestly how do you people manage to tie your shoelaces?

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 120K

    Comments