243 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
105 points

Google results are actually already pretty terrible. They just have tremendous inertia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I stopped using them months ago. I only notice when I’m looking for places (e.g., restaurants, barbers).

I’m not unhappy but may still shop around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

yeah, I appreciate the push towards more privacy-centric search engines but as a result searches that are relevant to me geographically on places like startpage are next to useless. I understand why but I wish that local results were a bit better on the alternatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

We all keep saying this but can anybody point me to which one is better?

I invariably end up having to go back to them because the other search engines all have their own problems.

The issue is the internet is polluted with SEO and all the useful things that used to be spread out are now condensed onto places like Reddit, or places that aren’t even being indexed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Supposedly there’s a paid one that is good. I haven’t tried. The thing is Google is completely enshittified. They don’t have to care about you or the sites you search. So my theory is Bing is better because they are hungrier and anything that takes away market share from Google is good—but I’m fully aware that Microsoft was just as shitty as Google and will be again if they get back on top.

Everything else I know of is either just an alternate front end for one of them or an aggregator of both. So you’re right, there’s precious little alternative to Google. But it’s almost bad enough I’m ready for the return of web rings of good sites vouching for each other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Part 5 is where I don’t see this actually going.

Look at twitter. Now look at mastodon. Tell me which one is more shitty. Now tell me which one has something like 85% of the market, and which one most people haven’t heard of.

Just because something it better, doesn’t mean people use it. You can fit all of Lemmy in the world in one of the larger NBA size arenas. You can’t even fit twitters total user base into some smaller CITIES.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think the amount of people who are familiar with search engine options besides Google is quite a bit larger than the population of Lemmy. (It fuckin better be, anyway)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Twitter will be dead within 1-2 years, Elon will make sure of that

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

He’s already owned it for nearly two years. I’d definitely take the over on that bet. I just don’t see what Twitter could possibly do that they haven’t done already to kill it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

God I hope you’re right, but doubt you are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I’m pretty pessimistic about this:

  1. Say no
  2. Google still scrapes your site to train their AI
  3. People don’t care that its wrong, still use Google instead of other search engines
permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points
  1. Say no
  2. You don’t show up in Google search results
  3. You still show up in other search results
  4. Google is no longer bringing the best results
  5. People stop using your site
  6. You lose
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Unfortunately, the vast majority of people do not give a single fuck and they will use whatever is preinstalled on their device

permalink
report
parent
reply
95 points

Let’s DuckDuckGOOOOOOO!

permalink
report
reply
56 points

For now.

DDG gets search results from Bing, owned by Microsoft. And I wouldn’t be surprised if the later did the same as Google did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points
*

That’s technically true, but it’s as misleading as saying they get their search results from Yandex. Their results are aggregated from several search engines, not just Bing. They also have their own web crawler, DuckDuckBot, which absolutely respects RobotRules.

Edit: I’m told my information is out of date. No more Yandex because of Uncle Sam. Yahoo is just Bing now, so that index doesn’t count anymore. The bulk of the rest of their sources are largely inconsequential specialized search engines. Their sources page states that they “largely source from Bing”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Fair point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Where is your evidence for that? It used to be Bing and Yandex, but now it’s just Bing. They use other non search engine APIs and do a small amount of crawling AFAIK. Details of who uses what here: https://seirdy.one/posts/2021/03/10/search-engines-with-own-indexes/

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There’s an article from this spring’s 2600 magazine that claims it’s all Bing results. I haven’t dug through their Python code and I’m definitely no expert anyway, but I’d also prefer not to post an article from a small independent magazine like that to let the people on Lemmy who do know more than me take a look.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

DuckDuckGo is just Bing. Which is uh… going from Google to Microsoft. Maybe not much better either

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

We’re at a point where not only should the Internet be classified as a utility, so should Search.

permalink
report
reply
26 points
*

Yeah, it’s not just e.g. water that is the utility, pipes and pumping stations are part of it. Otherwise you have water…uh…somewhere, go get it yourself.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Oh look, more anticompetitive shenanigans.

Break Google up. Bring the full force of antitrust down on them.

Anything else is an unmitigated disaster waiting to happen.

permalink
report
reply
27 points
*

Can someone explain why the fuck Google is pushing this so hard? Generative AI is not a general intelligence, and useless for concrete facts. Google has already demonstrated how shitty it is for information, and the people with the knowledge to work on the project have to know this.

So why the fuck are they all full steam ahead on something that will always be useless for them?

permalink
report
reply
34 points

Because the engineers aren’t in charge anymore

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

AI is hype.
They’ve recently signed a deal with Reddit for AI parsable data. Reddit reciprocated by allowing Google to be the only indexable search engine.
Google now thinks it can do the same to literally everyone else.
Googling is pretty damn mainstream.
Don’t give Google your data, then don’t be included in googles search results. It’s like a flip of their previous trade with reddit, except it’s not a trade. It’s extortion.

Reddit never gave Google traffic. They gave them content and data.
And Google thinks it can withdraw traffic from other sites unless they get data in return.
Google is a monopoly.
Literally extortion

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Their line goes up when they show they’re investing in AI, and it goes down when it looks like they’re falling behind or not investing enough in it.

TBH, a lot of times I find myself interacting with ChatGPT instead of searching. It’s overhyped, but it’s useful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Magic beans.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 574K

    Comments