I’m so glad I’m not growing up in this age of smartphones, social media, and bullshit generators. Life was hell enough in the 90s without all that noise.

117 points

This is a misleading headline. The survey question asked if you know any friends OR CLASSMATES who have generated AI nudes. If just one kid in a large school generates AI nudes and a lot of other kids find out about it, then those kids will answer yes on this survey. So this statistic doesn’t do a good job of indicating exactly how widespread this is.

permalink
report
reply
25 points

The whole premise of the survey is absurd. Almost no one would actually admit to using it, so we’re multiplying a super small ratio of admittance by a super large ratio of acquaintance and assuming the two cancel which is almost certainly not true.

It’s all speculation, the only way to know how many people are using these things is by website visit analytics which these companies would never give away (for free).

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Still, even assuming Rumor mill inflation drives this down by a factor of 10, and we slash it down, there are a handful of kids probably doing this, which isn’t surprising, bit is extremely upsetting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

try a factor of 100

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Sure, in a school with a few thousand kids that is still a few dozens students making AI generated nudes. Larher the school, bigger the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What’s he to upset? Puberty hits hard. It’s a natural call plus modern technologies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
94 points

I’m so glad I’m not growing up in this age of smartphones, social media, and bullshit generators. Life was hell enough in the 90s without all that noise.

Turned 18 in 1995 here. I can’t say with absolute certainty that I wouldn’t have done the same thing as a horny teenager. Although I doubt I would have told anyone about it.

permalink
report
reply
44 points

Yeah, this is a manifestation of those horny thoughts that go too far unfortunately. I’m unsure how you would even tackle this problem

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Easy just threaten anyone who is caught creating fakes of underage girls with fakes of them with a tiny penis. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Jail 'em all! The children yearn to manufacture licence plates! /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I swear it’s a fake guys!

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

10% prefer not to say

I hate to break it to you but that makes it 2 in 10

permalink
report
reply
31 points

TBH kids need a new culture/attititude towards digital media, where they basically assume anything they consume on their phones is likely bogus. Like a whole new layer of critical thinking.

I think it’s already shifting this direction with the popularity of private chats at the expense of “public” social media.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Yep, at this point your real nudes could leak and you can just plausibly claim they’re faked.

Something will change, but I’m not sure where society will decide to land on this topic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Unless you have a birthmark no one knew about 😳

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

If no one knows about it you could claim not to have it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

That’s definitely going to happen organically, especially since this is a genie that is definitely never going back in the bottle. It’s only going to become more convincing, more accessible, and more widespread, even for simply ‘self-contained’ use, especially by hormone-flooded teenagers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Even if all AI developement is outlawed, this minute, everywhere, the genie is already out of the bottle. Flux 1.dev is bascially photorealsitic for many situations, and there will always be someone hosting it in some sketchy jurisdiction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I kinda doubt anyone is getting “fooled” by these at this point, though that is a whole nother layer of horrible hell in store for us…

Right now, we’re dealing with the most basic questions:

  • Is it immoral (and/or should it be illegal) for people to be trading pornographic approximations of you?
  • Is it immoral (and/or should it be illegal) for people to privately make pornographic approximations of you?
  • Is it immoral (and/or should it be illegal) to distribute software which allows people to make pornographic approximations of others?
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
  1. Illegal
  2. Immoral
  3. If built specifially for? Illegal. If it’s a tool with proper blockages that ends up having a way to break away and make them anyway? No.
permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Having myself been a horny little perv at that age that surprises me little. Hell, I bet those are low numbers.

permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 466K

    Comments